Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31994006›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2021

Peer Mentors for People with Advanced Cancer: Lessons Learnt from Recruiting and Training Peer Mentors for a Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.

Catherine Walshe, Diane Roberts, Lynn Calman, Lynda Appleton, Robert Croft, Guillermo Perez Algorta, Suzanne Skevington, Mari Lloyd-Williams, Gunn Grande

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Online peer support program for women with metastatic cancer: a pre-post evaluation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine WalsheInternational Observatory on End of Life Care, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster, UK. c.walshe@lancaster.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4531-8608
Diane RobertsDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Manchester University, Manchester, UK.
Lynn CalmanMacmillan Survivorship Research Group, School of Health Sciences, Southampton University, Southampton, UK.
Lynda AppletonClatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Wirral, UK.
Robert Croft, Liverpool, UK.
Guillermo Perez AlgortaDivision of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Suzanne SkevingtonManchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Psychological Sciences, Manchester University, Manchester, UK.
Mari Lloyd-WilliamsAPSCSG, Institute of Population and Health Sciences, Liverpool, UK.
Gunn GrandeDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Manchester University, Manchester, UK.
Lancaster University · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBClatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0614-34070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peer mentors may offer distinctive forms of support to people with advanced cancer. Whilst peer mentor programmes are known, little is understood about recruiting and training peer mentors to support those with advanced cancer. The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility of recruiting and training peer mentors for a novel peer mentor intervention to promote well-being in people with advanced cancer. Feasibility study testing proactive introduction to a trained peer mentor for 12 weeks in the context of a randomized controlled two-arm trial and nested qualitative process evaluation was used. Peer mentors have/had cancer, recruited via an open call. Two-day training included a new bespoke module on coping with cancer. Descriptive recruitment and training data were captured, supplemented by qualitative interviews, analysed thematically. Forty-eight people expressed interest, mostly female (69%), with breast cancer (32%), and recruited via social media (49%). Twelve people completed training, with attrition often due to availability or mentors' own health; many had advanced cancer themselves. They wanted to 'give something back', but also formed supportive bonds with fellow mentors. It is feasible to recruit and train people with lived experience of cancer to be peer mentors, but those with particular characteristics may predominate. Broad social media based recruitment may have merit in widening the pool of potential peer mentors.

Indexed as

MentorsNeoplasmsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMalePeer GroupCancerFeasibility studyPalliative carePeer MentorRecruitmentVolunteer

Identifiers

PMID31994006
PMCPMC8328854
OpenAlexW3000999703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.