ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2021
Are Type and Screen Samples Routinely Necessary Before Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy?
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Substantial international variation in the cost of blood group and save and crossmatch: A systematic review.British journal of haematology · 2026Pooled it
- Requirement of preoperative blood typing for cholecystectomy and appendectomy: a systematic review.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Preoperative Group and Save Tests in Elective and Emergency Cholecystectomies: An Economic and Environmental Burden.Cureus · 2025Article
- Assessment of routine pre-operative group and save testing in patients undergoing cholecystectomy: a retrospective cohort study.NIHR open research · 2024Article
- Cost-effectiveness of routine type and screens in select urological surgeries.International urology and nephrology · 2023Article
- Selective type & screen for elective colectomy based on a transfusion risk score may generate substantial cost savings.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Routine Type and Screens in Select Endonasal Skull Base Surgeries.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsType and screen (T&S) samples are routinely requested before all laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LCs) at our centre despite the low reported risk of major vascular injury and peri-operative transfusion. Our retrospective case series aimed to identify local transfusion need to inform policy.
methodsEmergency and elective LC performed at a single tertiary centre between March 2014 and October 2016 (30 months) were analysed. This included all patients aged ≥ 16, and procedures converted to open where LC was the primary procedure. Peri-operative complications and transfusion data were obtained from electronic records.
resultsIn total, 1002 consecutive patients met inclusion criteria; 12 patients were transfused during index admission (1.20%). No patients required emergency transfusion or had major vascular injuries. Despite local policy, 106 patients (10.6%) did not have a valid T&S sample prior to their procedure. Transfused patients were more likely to be emergency admissions (n = 10/12). The most common indications for transfusion were pre-operative anaemia (n = 7/12) and septic coagulopathy (n = 2/12).
conclusionsPeri-operative transfusions at our centre were low. No patients required intra-operative blood transfusions dependent on a pre-operative T&S sample. Patients requiring transfusion were predictable from their pre-operative clinical status. We propose that a highly selective T&S policy is safe and can reduce costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31993966What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.