Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31993841›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2020

Igniting and Maintaining Hope: The Voices of People Living with Mental Illness.

Wing Shan Yeung, Nicola Hancock, Anne Honey, Karen Wells, Justin N Scanlan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wing Shan YeungSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Nicola HancockSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. nicola.hancock@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-6877-9239
Anne HoneySchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Karen WellsSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Justin N ScanlanSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study objective was to identify the types of experiences that consumers identify as igniting and maintaining hope, and those most frequently reported. Data were collected through an anonymous online survey. Two open-ended questions elicited reflective personal accounts regarding hope-promoting experiences. Using an interpretive content analysis design, data were coded inductively using constant comparative analysis. Numbers of participants reporting each type of experience were calculated to identify patterns of hopeful experiences. Findings from 72 participants highlighted a diversity of hope-promoting experiences and sources. Fifteen experiences were identified, forming two broad categories: interactions and experiences involving others, and personal or internal experiences, insights and actions. Findings suggest that consumers play an active role in igniting and maintaining their own hope. Peer workers and health workers can support this by being cognizant of the quality of their interactions with consumers and by facilitating connections with others, particularly families, friends and peers.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersHopeHumansPeer GroupHopeIndividuals living with mental illnessPeer learningRecoveryRecovery-oriented practice

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.