Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31993775›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2020

Evaluation of specific quality metrics to assess the performance of a specialised newborn transport programme.

Itziar Marsinyach Ros, Laura Sanchez García, Ana Sanchez Torres, Rocio Mosqueda Peña, Maria Del Carmen Pérez Grande, Maria José Rodríguez Castaño, Maria Dolores Elorza Fernández, Manuel Sánchez Luna

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Data variables reported during neonatal transport: a systematic literature review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Itziar Marsinyach RosNewborn Specialized Transport Madrid (SUMMA 112), Neonatology Department, Gregorio Marañón Hospital, O'Donnell 48 Street, 28009, Madrid, Spain. itziar.marsinyach@salud.madrid.org.
Laura Sanchez GarcíaNewborn Specialized Transport Madrid (SUMMA 112), Neonatology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Ana Sanchez TorresNewborn Specialized Transport Madrid (SUMMA 112), Neonatology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Rocio Mosqueda PeñaNewborn Specialized Transport Madrid (SUMMA 112), Neonatology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Maria Del Carmen Pérez GrandeNewborn Specialized Transport Madrid (SUMMA 112), Neonatology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Maria José Rodríguez CastañoNewborn Specialized Transport Madrid (SUMMA 112), Neonatology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Maria Dolores Elorza FernándezNewborn Specialized Transport Madrid (SUMMA 112), Neonatology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Manuel Sánchez LunaNewborn Specialized Transport Madrid (SUMMA 112), Neonatology Department, Gregorio Marañón Hospital, O'Donnell 48 Street, 28009, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Universitario La Paz · ESHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESHospital Clínico San Carlos · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a lack of consensus on quality indicators suitable for neonatal transport. The aim of this study is to make a proposal for specific quality indicators for newborn transport. A retrospective descriptive study was performed (2009 to 2015) where twenty-four indicators were selected, evaluated and classified according to the 6 dimensions of quality of the Institute of Medicine. Among the 24 evaluated quality metrics, there were 3 of them which needed a correction when evaluating neonatal transport performance, because they were significantly correlated with gestational age. They were (a) stabilisation time, (b) prevalence of newborn arterial hypotension (defined by gestational age) and (c) unnoticed hypothermia at referral hospital.Conclusion: Quality evaluation through the definition of specific metrics in newborn transport is feasible. These indicators should be defined or adjusted for newborn population to measure the actual performance of the transport service.What is Known:• Quality indicators may help in defining metrics for clinical practice, promoting benchmarking and defining areas of improvement.• Newborn characteristics call for a specialised care, and quality measure during newborn transport require specific metrics. Quality metrics for paediatric transport have been defined using Delphi method. Some of these measures need to be specific for newborn, due to their intrinsic characteristics.What is New:• Using evidence-based literature and our newborn transport experience, specific quality indicators for newborn transport are suggested.• Data analysis shows how some indicators need to be adjusted for gestational age.

Indexed as

Quality Indicators, Health CareFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesLinear ModelsLogistic ModelsMaleNeonatologyQuality Assurance, Health CareRetrospective StudiesTransportation of PatientsIndicatorsMetricsNewbornQuality improvementTransport

Identifiers

PMID31993775
PMCPMC7223594
OpenAlexW3003808530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.