Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31993737›Full record

Trial reportLangenbeck's archives of surgery2020

Diffusion-weighted MRI predicts the histologic response for neoadjuvant therapy in patients with pancreatic cancer: a prospective study (DIFFERENT trial).

Ken-Ichi Okada, Manabu Kawai, Seiko Hirono, Fumiyoshi Kojima, Kensuke Tanioka, Masaki Terada, Motoki Miyazawa, Yuji Kitahata, Yoshifumi Iwahashi, Masaki Ueno and 4 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. MRI for restaging pancreatic cancer.Insights into imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Toward diffusion MRI in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Post-neoadjuvant treatment pancreatic cancer resectability and outcome prediction using CT,Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ken-Ichi OkadaSecond Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, 641-8510, Japan.
Manabu KawaiSecond Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, 641-8510, Japan.
Seiko HironoSecond Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, 641-8510, Japan.
Fumiyoshi KojimaDepartment of Human Pathology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, 641-8510, Japan.
Kensuke TaniokaClinical Study Support Center, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, 641-8510, Japan.
Masaki TeradaWakayama Minami Radiology Clinic, Wakayama, 641-0012, Japan.
Motoki MiyazawaSecond Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, 641-8510, Japan.
Yuji KitahataSecond Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, 641-8510, Japan.
Yoshifumi IwahashiDepartment of Human Pathology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, 641-8510, Japan.
Masaki UenoSecond Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, 641-8510, Japan.
Shinya HayamiSecond Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, 641-8510, Japan.
Shin-Ichi MurataDepartment of Human Pathology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, 641-8510, Japan.
Toshio ShimokawaClinical Study Support Center, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, 641-8510, Japan.
Hiroki YamaueSecond Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, 641-8510, Japan. yamaue-h@wakayama-med.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6982-3457

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePre-operative prediction of histological response to neoadjuvant therapy aids decisions regarding surgical management of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). We elucidate correlation between pre-/post-treatment whole-tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and rate of tumor cell destruction. We newly verify whether post-treatment ADC value at the site of vascular contact predicts R0 resectability of BRPC.

methodsWe prospectively reviewed 28 patients with BRPC who underwent diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging before neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. Correlation between the percentage of tumor cell destruction and various parameters was analyzed. Strong parameters were assessed for their ability to predict therapeutic histological response and R0 resectability.

resultsPre-/post-treatment whole-tumor ADC value correlated with tumor cell destruction rate by all parameters (R = 0.630/0.714, P < 0.001/< 0.0001). The post-treatment cutoff value of ADC at the site of vascular contact for discriminating histological response of tumor destruction of ≤ 50% and tumor destruction of > 50% was determined at 1.42 × 10

conclusionsPost-treatment whole-tumor ADC value may be a predictor of R0 resectability in patients with BRPC. Tumor cell destruction rate is indicated by the difference between pre-/post-treatment ADC values. This difference is strongly affected by the pre-treatment ADC value. The cutoff value of ADC at the site of vascular contact could not discriminate R0 resectability.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeoadjuvant TherapyAgedAlbuminsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDeoxycytidineFemaleGemcitabineHumansMaleMiddle AgedPaclitaxelPancreatectomyPancreatic NeoplasmsPerioperative CarePositron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography130-nm albumin-bound paclitaxelAlbuminsDeoxycytidineGemcitabinePaclitaxelApparent diffusion coefficientBorderline resectableR0 resectability

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.