Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31993736›Full record

Trial reportClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2020

Drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent in small coronary artery lesions: angiographic analysis from the BASKET-SMALL 2 trial.

Gregor Fahrni, Bruno Scheller, Michael Coslovsky, Nicole Gilgen, Ahmed Farah, Marc-Alexander Ohlow, Norman Mangner, Daniel Weilenmann, Jochen Wöhrle, Florim Cuculi and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01574534 (A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Open Label, Multicenter Trial to Test the Non-inferiority of Drug Eluting Balloon vs. Drug Eluting Stent Treatment in de Novo Stenoses of Small Native Vessels Regarding Efficacy and Safety), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01574534 nacompletednot on this map

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Open Label, Multicenter Trial to Test the Non-inferiority of Drug Eluting Balloon vs. Drug Eluting Stent Treatment in de Novo Stenoses of Small Native Vessels Regarding Efficacy and Safety

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandRan2012 to 2020Enrolled758ConditionsCoronary Heart DiseaseArmsDrug eluting balloon, Drug eluting stent
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. DCB therapy: quo vadis?Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Coatings for Cardiovascular Stents-An Up-to-Date Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Paclitaxel drug-coated balloon-only angioplasty for de novo coronary artery disease in elective clinical practice.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Long-term safety of paclitaxel drug-coated balloon-only angioplasty for de novo coronary artery disease: the SPARTAN DCB study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2021
    Article
  14. Causes of death after treatment of small coronary artery disease with paclitaxel-coated balloons.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Coronary Drug-Coated Balloons for De Novo and In-Stent Restenosis Indications.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Gregor FahrniDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Bruno SchellerClinical and Experimental Interventional Cardiology, University of Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Michael CoslovskyDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Nicole GilgenDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Ahmed FarahKnappschaftskrankenhaus, Klinikum Westfalen, Dortmund, Germany.
Marc-Alexander OhlowCentral Clinic, Bad Berka, Germany.
Norman MangnerHeart Center Dresden at the Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Daniel WeilenmannKantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Jochen WöhrleUniversity Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Florim CuculiKantonsspital Luzern, Luzern, Switzerland.
Gregor LeibundgutKantonsspital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland.
Sven Möbius-WinklerUniversity Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
Robert ZweikerUniversity Hospital Graz, Graz, Austria.
Raphael TwerenboldDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Christoph KaiserDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Raban JegerDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland. raban.jeger@usb.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1290-5491
BASKET-SMALL 2 Investigators
University of Basel · CHKantonsspital Baselland · CHKantonsspital St. Gallen · CHGraz University Hospital · ATKlinikum Westfalen (Germany) · DELuzerner Kantonsspital · CHUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHZentralklinik Bad Berka · DE

Funding

B. Braun Medical AG Switzerland 12345Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 12345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe randomized BASKET-SMALL 2 trial showed non-inferiority for treatment with drug-coated balloon (DCB) compared with drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries regarding clinical endpoints at 1 year. In this predefined substudy, we investigated the angiographic findings in patients undergoing a clinically indicated follow-up angiography during the study phase.

methodsEight-hundred and eighty-three patients underwent PCI with either DES or DCB in a culprit vessel < 3 mm in diameter for stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndrome. Event-driven re-angiographies and the corresponding images at baseline were analyzed for angiographic endpoints.

resultsOne-hundred and eleven patients (117 lesions, 66 DES versus 51 DCB) presented for an unscheduled re-angiography at median 5.7 months after the index procedure. At baseline, mean reference vessel diameter was 2.05 mm and the residual in-segment stenosis after the index procedure was less in DES compared to DCB (23.7% vs 33.8%, p = 0.001). At follow-up angiography, diameter stenosis in the DES group (29.0%) was still somewhat smaller than after DCB angioplasty (35.8%) when adjusting for time since PCI (p = 0.047), whereas lumen loss (LL) did not differ between the two treatment arms (LL-DES 0.06 mm vs LL-DCB 0.10 mm, p = 0.20). Eight patients following DES implantation presented with a complete occlusion of the target lesion compared to no occlusion in the DCB group (p = 0.009).

conclusionsThe clinically indicated follow-up angiography within 1 year showed no difference in LL. Complete thrombotic vessel occlusions were found only in the DES group. CLINICAL

trial registrationwww.clinicaltrials.gov ; number, NCT01574534.

Indexed as

Drug-Eluting StentsAgedAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPercutaneous Coronary InterventionTreatment OutcomeDe novoDrug-coated balloonDrug-eluting balloonPercutaneous coronary interventionQuantitative coronary analysisSmall vessel disease

Identifiers

PMID31993736
OpenAlexW3004320383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.