Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31993505›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2020

Bayesian strategy selection identifies optimal solutions to complex problems using an example from GP prescribing.

S Allender, J Hayward, S Gupta, A Sanigorski, S Rana, H Seward, S Jacobs, S Venkatesh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

S Allender1Global Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap St, Geelong, VIC 3221 Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4842-3294
J Hayward1Global Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap St, Geelong, VIC 3221 Australia.
S Gupta2Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, 75 Pigdons Rd, Waurn Ponds, VIC 3216 Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4669-9940
A Sanigorski1Global Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap St, Geelong, VIC 3221 Australia.
S Rana2Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, 75 Pigdons Rd, Waurn Ponds, VIC 3216 Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2247-850X
H Seward3School of Medicine, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap St, Geelong, VIC 3221 Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2788-9335
S Jacobs2Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, 75 Pigdons Rd, Waurn Ponds, VIC 3216 Australia.
S Venkatesh2Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Deakin University, 75 Pigdons Rd, Waurn Ponds, VIC 3216 Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8675-6631

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex health problems require multi-strategy, multi-target interventions. We present a method that uses machine learning techniques to choose optimal interventions from a set of possible interventions within a case study aiming to increase General Practitioner (GP) discussions of physical activity (PA) with their patients. Interventions were developed based on a causal loop diagram with 26 GPs across 13 clinics in Geelong, Australia. GPs prioritised eight from more than 80 potential interventions to increase GP discussion of PA with patients. Following a 2-week baseline, a multi-arm bandit algorithm was used to assign optimal strategies to GP clinics with the target outcome being GP PA discussion rates. The algorithm was updated weekly and the process iterated until the more promising strategies emerged (a duration of seven weeks). The top three performing strategies were continued for 3 weeks to improve the power of the hypothesis test of effectiveness for each strategy compared to baseline. GPs recorded a total of 11,176 conversations about PA. GPs identified 15 factors affecting GP PA discussion rates with patients including GP skills and awareness, fragmentation of care and fear of adverse outcomes. The two most effective strategies were correctly identified within seven weeks of the algorithm-based assignment of strategies. These were clinic reception staff providing PA information to patients at check in and PA screening questionnaires completed in the waiting room. This study demonstrates an efficient way to test and identify optimal strategies from multiple possible solutions.

Indexed as

Decision makingLifestyle modification

Identifiers

PMID31993505
PMCPMC6971230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.