Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31993436›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2019

Use of Animal and Animal Products for Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment: An Explorative Study in Odisha, India.

Mousumi Samal, Krushna Chandra Sahoo, Sanghamitra Pati, Saumya Ranjan Tripathy, Manoj Kumar Parida, Bidyut Kumar Das

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mousumi SamalRegional Medical Research Centre, Indian Council of Medical Research, Bhubaneswar, India.
Krushna Chandra SahooRegional Medical Research Centre, Indian Council of Medical Research, Bhubaneswar, India.
Sanghamitra PatiRegional Medical Research Centre, Indian Council of Medical Research, Bhubaneswar, India.
Saumya Ranjan TripathyClinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Srirama Chandra Bhanja Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, India.
Manoj Kumar ParidaClinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Srirama Chandra Bhanja Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, India.
Bidyut Kumar DasClinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Srirama Chandra Bhanja Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, India.
Sriram Chandra Bhanja Medical College Hospital · INIndian Council of Medical Research · INRegional Medical Research Centre · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe fatigue, pain, deformity, and disability, are the major concerns for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The extreme pain experienced by the patients often force them to experiment with various indigenous substances including animals and animal products. However, there is little evidence on the use of animals or animal products as traditional medicine in RA. Hence, this study was aimed to explore the experience and perception of patients toward the use of animals and animal products for the treatment of RA. A qualitative, explorative study was conducted at the out-patient-department of Rheumatology of a tertiary care medical college and hospital at Cuttack, Odisha, India. Out of 113 patients with RA, 18 patients gave history of use of animal and/or animal products and were selected for in-depth interviews. The content analysis methods were used for data analysis. Four major categories emerged: (1) prevailing patterns of traditional treatment of RA using animals, (2) beliefs and values behind the traditional treatment of RA, (3) sources and traditional learning pathway of indigenous practices on RA, and (4) ethical aspects of the indigenous practice of using animals and/or animal products in the treatment of RA. This study revealed the practice of eating dead animals to get relief from RA. However, there was hardly any perceived positive outcome of the practice; which indicates the lack of awareness of rational, scientific, treatment, and prevalence of irrational and unethical practices for the treatment of RA. Hence, community awareness, social mobilization, and newer screening tools are necessary to improve the timely detection and prevention of irrational treatment practices among RA patients.

Indexed as

folk healingindigenous treatmentmusculoskeletal disordersrheumatoid arthritistraditional remedy

Identifiers

PMID31993436
PMCPMC6970967
OpenAlexW3000355668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.