Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31993416›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2019

Cellular Metrology: Scoping for a Value Proposition in Extra- and Intracellular Measurements.

Nilofar Faruqui, Andreas Kummrow, Boqiang Fu, Carla Divieto, Fabiola Rojas, Florence Kisulu, Janaina J V Cavalcante, Jing Wang, Jonathan Campbell, Juliana L Martins and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Transfection reflections: fit-for-purpose delivery of nucleic acids.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. In Utero Programming of Testicular Cancer.Journal of developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Nilofar FaruquiNational Physical Laboratory, Teddington, United Kingdom.
Andreas KummrowPhysikalisch Technische Bundesanstalt, Berlin, Germany.
Boqiang FuNational Institute of Metrology, Beijing, China.
Carla DivietoIstituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica, Turin, Italy.
Fabiola RojasInstituto de Salud Pública de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Florence KisuluKenya Bureau of Standards, Mombasa, Kenya.
Janaina J V CavalcanteNational Institute of Metrology, Quality and Technology (INMETRO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Jing WangNational Institute of Metrology, Beijing, China.
Jonathan CampbellNational Measurement Laboratory at LGC, Teddington, United Kingdom.
Juliana L MartinsNational Institute of Metrology, Quality and Technology (INMETRO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Jun-Hyuk ChoiKorea Research Institute of Standards and Science, Daejeon, South Korea.
Maria Paola SassiIstituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica, Turin, Italy.
Massimo ZuccoIstituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica, Turin, Italy.
Maxim VonskyD. I. Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Sandrine VessillierNational Institute for Biological Standards and Control, Potters Bar, United Kingdom.
Shan ZouMetrology Research Centre, National Research Council, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Shin-Ichiro FujiiNational Metrology Institute of Japan, Tsukuba, Japan.
Maxim G RyadnovNational Physical Laboratory, Teddington, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The symptomatic irreproducibility of data in biomedicine and biotechnology prompts the need for higher order measurements of cells in their native and near-native environments. Such measurements may support the adoption of new technologies as well as the development of research programs across different sectors including healthcare and clinic, environmental control and national security. With an increasing demand for reliable cell-based products and services, cellular metrology is poised to help address current and emerging measurement challenges faced by end-users. However, metrological foundations in cell analysis remain sparse and significant advances are necessary to keep pace with the needs of modern medicine and industry. Herein we discuss a role of metrology in cell and cell-related R&D activities to underpin growing international measurement capabilities. Relevant measurands are outlined and the lack of reference methods and materials, particularly those based on functional cell responses in native environments, is highlighted. The status quo and current challenges in cellular measurements are discussed in the light of metrological traceability in cell analysis and applications (e.g., a functional cell count). An emphasis is made on the consistency of measurement results independent of the analytical platform used, high confidence in data quality vs. quantity, scale of measurements and issues of building infrastructure for end-users.

Indexed as

cell metrologygene therapiesregenerative medecinestandardsstem cellstraceability

Identifiers

PMID31993416
PMCPMC6970939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.