ArticleApplications in plant sciences2020
Development of chloroplast microsatellite markers for giant ragweed (
Article in Applications in plant sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Plastome characterization of Embelia ribes Burm. f. (Myrsinoideae: Primulaceae): comparative analysis and phylogenetic inference.Journal of biosciences · 2026Article
- Harnessing chloroplast SSRs to decipher genetic diversity in underutilizedFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Complete Plastid Genome Sequences of Four Salsoleae s.l. Species: Comparative and Phylogenetic Analyses.Biomolecules · 2024Article
- Development of Chloroplast Microsatellite Markers and Evaluation of Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Cutleaf Groundcherry (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Chloroplast and Nuclear Genetic Diversity Explain the Limited Distribution of Endangered and EndemicFrontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Development of chloroplast microsatellite markers for giant ragweed (Applications in plant sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
premisePlant invasions are increasing globally, and extensive study of the genetic background of the source and invading populations is needed to understand such biological processes. For this reason, chloroplast microsatellite markers were identified to explore the genetic diversity of the noxious weed METHODS AND
resultsThe complete chloroplast genome of
conclusionsThe novel chloroplast microsatellite markers developed in the current study demonstrate substantial cross-species transferability and will be helpful in future genetic diversity studies of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.