ArticleInternational journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology2019
How is the association between urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) levels and Gleason scores in patients suspicious of prostate cancer?
Article in International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The research progress on diagnostic indicators related to prostate-specific antigen gray-zone prostate cancer.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- PCA3 in Prostate Cancer.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionProstate cancer is one of the most common cancers in men which is mostly slow growing and responses well to treatments if early diagnosed. Urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) assay is a new method with effective results in diagnosing prostate cancer. The aim of this present study was evaluate the correlation between urinary PCA3 and Gleason scores in patients who are suspicious of prostate cancer and undergo tissue biopsies.
methodsThis is a cross-sectional study which was performed in 2017-2018. The patients included this study complain of prostate problems and were selected from Nour hospital, Ali-Asghar hospital and Ordibehesht clinic in Tehran, Iran. Urinary PCA3 levels were checked in all patients and then they went under prostate biopsies. Amounts of PCA3 and Gleason scores were collected and analyzed using SPSS software.
findingsWe evaluated a total number of 80 patients. 40 patients had prostate cancer and 40 had no cancer. We indicated that no significant relation was reported between Gleason scores and urinary PCA3 levels. Levels of urinary PCA3 were higher in patients with prostate cancer than in patients with no cancer (P=0.007). DISCUSSION: Generally, urinary PCA3 test is indicated as a non-invasive method to improve the specificity of prostate cancer diagnosis and its potential predictive value was studied in numerous clinical researches, but here we found higher PCA3 levels in patients with prostate cancer than in patients with and other prostate problems. We conclude that PCA3 functions as a diagnostic test and its changes in prostate cancer need to be further studied in different populations and races.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31993103PMC6971503W3013301523What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.