Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31992975›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2019

Increased Goal Tracking in Adolescent Rats Is Goal-Directed and Not Habit-Like.

Analise N Rode, Bita Moghaddam, Sara E Morrison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Prefrontal cortex development and its implications in mental illness.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Reward-Mediated, Model-Free Reinforcement-Learning Mechanisms in Pavlovian and Instrumental Tasks Are Related.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Differential Dopamine Dynamics in Adolescents and Adults.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Analise N RodeDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Bita MoghaddamDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Sara E MorrisonDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.

Funding

NEUROCHEMICAL EFFECTS OF ANTIPSYCHOTIC DRUGSR01MH048404 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI BITA MOGHADDAM · 1997 to 2026
$5.0M
Neurochemical Effects of Antipsychotic DrugsR37MH048404 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MOGHADDAM, BITA · 2002 to 2012
$3.4M
Neural circuitry underlying individual differences in cue-driven reward-seeking behaviorR03DA045913 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MORRISON, SARA · 2019 to 2020
$157k
NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA045913NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH048404NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH048404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When a cue is paired with reward in a different location, some animals will approach the site of reward during the cue, a behavior called goal tracking, while other animals will approach and interact with the cue itself: a behavior called sign tracking. Sign tracking is thought to reflect a tendency to transfer incentive salience from the reward to the cue. Adolescence is a time of heightened sensitivity to rewards, including environmental cues that have been associated with rewards, which may account for increased impulsivity and vulnerability to drug abuse. Surprisingly, however, studies have shown that adolescents are actually less likely to interact with the cue (i.e., sign track) than adult animals. We reasoned that adolescents might show decreased sign tracking, accompanied by increased apparent goal tracking, because they tend to attribute incentive salience to a more reward-proximal "cue": the food magazine. On the other hand, adolescence is also a time of enhanced exploratory behavior, novelty-seeking, and behavioral flexibility. Therefore, adolescents might truly express more goal-directed reward-seeking and less inflexible habit-like approach to a reward-associated cue. Using a reward devaluation procedure to distinguish between these two hypotheses, we found that adolescents indeed exhibit more goal tracking, and less sign tracking, than a comparable group of adults. Moreover, adolescents' goal tracking behavior is highly sensitive to reward devaluation and therefore goal-directed and not habit-like.

Indexed as

adolescentdevaluationgoal trackinghabitPavlovian conditioningratsign tracking

Identifiers

PMID31992975
PMCPMC6971099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.