Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31992935›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2020

The future of the amputees with osseointegration: A systematic review of literature.

Christopher Gerzina, Eric Potter, Amgad M Haleem, Sherif Dabash

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06310239 (Osseointegrated Limb Implant Microbiome Population Adaptation Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06310239 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Osseointegrated Limb Implant Microbiome Population Adaptation Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorWalter Reed National Military Medical CenterRan2023 to 2029Enrolled50ConditionsAmputation With OsseointegrationArmsCollection of biologic samples and data
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. ReliableFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cortical and medullary morphology of the tibia.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christopher GerzinaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Texas Tech Health Sciences Center, 3601 4th St, 4th floor, Lubbock, Texas, 79430, USA.
Eric PotterDepartment of Medical Education, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso. Medical Education Building, 2200 5001 El Paso Drive, El Paso, Texas, 79905, USA.
Amgad M HaleemDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oklahoma University Health Sciences Center, 825 NE 10th Street, OU Physicians, 1C, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
Sherif DabashLimb Lengthening and Complex Reconstruction Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70 Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center · USAin Shams University · EGOU Health

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSocket prosthesis attachment is the current gold standard for limb amputees. Osseointegrated implantation is a novel technique that has many proposed advantages over the current gold standard. Clear advantages for its use over socket prosthetic attachment has been well established in literature. It decreases socket problems as pinching, pressure points, chronic skin problems and frequent socket change due to atrophy of muscles.

methodsWe reviewed primary research articles documenting complication rates and outcome measures in patients with osseointegrated prosthesis implantation after limb amputation.

resultsNine studies were identified with a total of 211-242 patients. Clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes, as well as complications were considered. The mean duration of follow-up was greater than 12 months in all studies.

conclusionsOsseointegration is an effective alternative to socket prosthesis in transfemoral amputees. Transtibial and upper extremity implants are underreported in the literature and clear indication for their effectiveness over socket prosthesis does not exist. Minor complications are most common, such as soft tissue infections, and may be mitigated in the future by improvements in surgical technique and implant design.The level of evidence is 3.

Indexed as

AmputationOsseointegrationTransfemoralTranstibial

Identifiers

PMID31992935
PMCPMC6977164
OpenAlexW2947876803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.