Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31992918›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2020

A three-year retrospective multi-center study on time to surgery and mortality for isolated geriatric hip fractures.

Allen Tanner Ii, Stephanie Jarvis, Alessandro Orlando, Nnamdi Nwafo, Robert Madayag, Zachary Roberts, Chad Corrigan, Matthew Carrick, Pamela Bourg, Wade Smith and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Mortality in COVID-19 patients after proximal femur fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Allen Tanner IiPenrose Hospital, 2222 North Nevada Ave, Colorado Springs, CO, 80907, USA.
Stephanie JarvisION Research, 383 Corona St. #319, Denver, CO, 80218, USA.
Alessandro OrlandoION Research, 383 Corona St. #319, Denver, CO, 80218, USA.
Nnamdi NwafoSwedish Medical Center, 501 E Hampden Ave, Englewood, CO, 80113, USA.
Robert MadayagSt. Anthony Hospital, 11600 West 2nd Place, Lakewood, CO, 80228, USA.
Zachary RobertsResearch Medical Center, 2316 East Meyer Blvd, Kansas City, MO, 64132, USA.
Chad CorriganWesley Medical Center, 550 N. Hillside St. Wichita, KS, 67214, USA.
Matthew CarrickMedical City Plano, 3901 West 15th Street, Plano, TX, 75075, USA.
Pamela BourgSt. Anthony Hospital, 11600 West 2nd Place, Lakewood, CO, 80228, USA.
Wade SmithSwedish Medical Center, 501 E Hampden Ave, Englewood, CO, 80113, USA.
David Bar-OrION Research, 383 Corona St. #319, Denver, CO, 80218, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are multiple reports on the effect of time to surgery for geriatric hip fractures; it remains unclear if earlier intervention is associated with improved mortality, hospital length of stay (HLOS), or cost.

methodsThis was a multi-center retrospective cohort study. Patients (≥65y.) admitted (1/14-1/16) to six level 1 trauma centers for isolated hip fractures were included. Patients were dichotomized into early (≤24 h of admission) or delayed surgery (>24 h). The primary outcome was mortality using the CDC National Death Index. Secondary outcomes included HLOS, complications, and hospital cost.

resultsThere were 1346 patients, 467 (35%) delayed and 879 (65%) early. The early group had more females (70% vs. 61%, p < 0.001) than the delayed group. The delayed group had a median of 2 comorbidities, whereas the early group had 1, p < 0.001. Mortality and complications were not significantly different between groups. After adjustment, the delayed group had no statistically significant increased risk of dying within one year, OR: 1.1 (95% CI:0.8, 1.5), compared to the early group. The average difference in HLOS was 1.1 days longer for the delayed group, when compared to the early group, p-diff<0.001, after adjustment. The average difference in cost for the delayed group was $2450 ($1550, $3400) more expensive per patient, than the early group, p < 0.001.

conclusionsThe results of this study provide further evidence that surgery within 24 h of admission is not associated with lower odds of death when compared to surgery after 24 h of admission, even after adjustment. However, a significant decrease in cost and HLOS was observed for early surgery. If causally linked, our data are 95% confident that earlier treatment could have saved a maximum of $1,587,800. Early surgery should not be pursued purely for the motivation of reducing hospital costs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Indexed as

AAOS, American Academy of Orthopedic SurgeonsACE, angiotensin-converting enzymeAIS, Abbreviated Injury ScaleAOR, adjusted odds ratioASA, American Society of AnesthesiologistsAUC, area under the curveCDC NDI, Centers for Disease Control National Death IndexCI, confidence intervalCOPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseGeriatric hip fracturesHLOS, Hospital Length of StayIQR, interquartile rangeLong-term mortalityOR, odds ratioRR, respiratory rateSBP, systolic blood pressureSD, standard deviationSE, standard errorTime to surgeryTQIP, Trauma Quality Improvement Program

Identifiers

PMID31992918
PMCPMC6977169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.