Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31992718›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Low growth resilience to drought is related to future mortality risk in trees.

Lucía DeSoto, Maxime Cailleret, Frank Sterck, Steven Jansen, Koen Kramer, Elisabeth M R Robert, Tuomas Aakala, Mariano M Amoroso, Christof Bigler, J Julio Camarero and 20 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Lucía DeSotoEstación Experimental de Zonas Áridas, Spanish National Research Council (EEZA-CSIC), Almería, Spain. luciadesoto@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5814-5865
Maxime CailleretINRAE, Université Aix-Marseille, UMR Recover, Aix-en-Provence, France.
Frank SterckForest Ecology and Forest Management Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Steven JansenInstitute of Systematic Botany and Ecology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4476-5334
Koen KramerForest Ecology and Forest Management Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1402-2775
Elisabeth M R RobertCREAF, Bellaterrra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Catalonia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3611-7265
Tuomas AakalaDepartment of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0160-6410
Mariano M AmorosoInstituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural (IRNAD), Universidad Nacional de Río Negro, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Río Negro, Argentina.
Christof BiglerForest Ecology, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3757-6356
J Julio CamareroInstituto Pirenaico de Ecología, Spanish National Research Council (IPE-CSIC), Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2436-2922
Katarina ČufarDepartment of Wood Science and Technology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7403-3994
Guillermo Gea-IzquierdoCentro de Investigación Forestal (CIFOR), Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0148-3721
Sten GillnerInstitute of Forest Botany and Forest Zoology, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Laurel J HaavikUSDA Forest Service, Missoula, MT, USA.
Ana-Maria HereşDepartment of Forest Sciences, Transilvania University of Brasov, Brasov, Romania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1839-1770
Jeffrey M KaneDepartment of Forestry and Wildland Resources, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1453-9608
Vyacheslav I KharukSukachev Institute of Forest, Siberian Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), Krasnoyarsk, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4736-0655
Thomas KitzbergerInstituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medio Ambiente (INIBOMA), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Bariloche, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9754-4121
Tamir KleinDepartment of Plant & Environmental Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3882-8845
Tom LevaničDepartment of Yield and Silviculture, Slovenian Forestry Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0986-8311
Juan C LinaresDepartment of Physical, Chemical and Natural Systems, Pablo de Olavide University, Seville, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8375-6353
Harri MäkinenNatural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Espoo, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1820-6264
Walter OberhuberDepartment of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5197-7044
Andreas PapadopoulosAgricultural University of Athens, Karpenissi, Greece.
Brigitte RohnerForest Ecology, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3768-092X
Gabriel Sangüesa-BarredaEiFAB-iuFOR, University of Valladolid, Soria, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7722-2424
Dejan B StojanovicInstitute of Lowland Forestry and Environment, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2967-2049
Maria Laura SuárezGrupo Ecología Forestal, CONICET - INTA, EEA Bariloche, Bariloche, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2737-6409
Ricardo VillalbaInstituto Argentino de Nivología Glaciología y Ciencias Ambientales (IANIGLA-CONICET), Mendoza, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8183-0310
Jordi Martínez-VilaltaCREAF, Bellaterrra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Catalonia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe droughts have the potential to reduce forest productivity and trigger tree mortality. Most trees face several drought events during their life and therefore resilience to dry conditions may be crucial to long-term survival. We assessed how growth resilience to severe droughts, including its components resistance and recovery, is related to the ability to survive future droughts by using a tree-ring database of surviving and now-dead trees from 118 sites (22 species, >3,500 trees). We found that, across the variety of regions and species sampled, trees that died during water shortages were less resilient to previous non-lethal droughts, relative to coexisting surviving trees of the same species. In angiosperms, drought-related mortality risk is associated with lower resistance (low capacity to reduce impact of the initial drought), while it is related to reduced recovery (low capacity to attain pre-drought growth rates) in gymnosperms. The different resilience strategies in these two taxonomic groups open new avenues to improve our understanding and prediction of drought-induced mortality.

Indexed as

DroughtsAdaptation, PhysiologicalClimate ChangeCycadopsidaEcologyForestsMagnoliopsidaMortalitySoilSpecies SpecificityStress, PhysiologicalSurvival AnalysisTreesWaterSoilWater

Identifiers

PMID31992718
PMCPMC6987235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.