Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31992662›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2020

PhenX: Environment measures for Tobacco Regulatory Research.

Jennifer B Unger, Frank J Chaloupka, Donna Vallone, James F Thrasher, Destiney S Nettles, Tabitha P Hendershot, Gary E Swan, PhenX TRR Environment Working Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Epidemiological Model for Conventional Tobacco Control Measures and Tobacco Endgame Policies.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jennifer B UngerDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9064-6603
Frank J ChaloupkaDepartment of Health Policy and Administration and Health Policy Center, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Donna ValloneDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Truth Initiative, Washington, Washington, DC, USA.
James F ThrasherArnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Destiney S NettlesRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Tabitha P HendershotRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Gary E SwanStanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
PhenX TRR Environment Working Group

Funding

USC Tobacco Center of Regulatory ScienceU54CA180905 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Raina Pang · 2018 to 2026
$39.0M
Genomic Resource Grant for the PhenX Toolkit - expansion and sustainabilityPhenX Supplement for COVID-19 ResearchU41HG007050 · NHGRI · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI HAMILTON, CAROL MARIE · 2013 to 2022
$21.2M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA180905NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG007050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA Working Group (WG) of tobacco regulatory science experts identified measures for the tobacco environment domain.

methodsThis article describes the methods by which measures were identified, selected, approved and placed in the PhenX Toolkit.

findingsThe WG identified 20 initial elements relevant to tobacco regulatory science and determined whether they were already in the PhenX Toolkit or whether novel or improved measures existed. In addition to the 10 complementary measures already in the Toolkit, the WG recommended 13 additional measures: aided and confirmed awareness of televised antitobacco advertising, interpersonal communication about tobacco advertising, media use, perceived effectiveness of antitobacco advertising, exposure to smoking on television and in the movies, social norms about tobacco (for adults and for youth), worksite policies, youth cigarette purchase behaviours and experiences, compliance with cigarette packaging and labelling policies, local and state tobacco control public policies, and neighbourhood-level racial/ethnic composition. Supplemental measures included youth social capital and compliance with smoke-free air laws and with point of sale and internet tobacco marketing restrictions. Gaps were identified in the areas of policy environment (public and private), communications environment, community environment and social environment (ie, the norms/acceptability of tobacco use).

conclusionsConsistent use of these tobacco environment measures will enhance rigor and reproducability of tobacco research.

Indexed as

Guidelines as TopicPolicySocial EnvironmentAdvertisingAdvisory CommitteesConsensusData CollectionHumansMass MediaResearch DesignSocial NormsSoftwareTobacco Useenvironmentmediapublic policy

Identifiers

PMID31992662
PMCPMC7712634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.