Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31992606›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2020

The Ohio State University Early Psychosis Intervention Center (EPICENTER) step-based care programme for individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis: study protocol for an observational study.

Nicholas J K Breitborde, Hossam Guirgis, Walter Stearns, Kristen M Carpenter, Ghada Lteif, Jacob G Pine, Nichole Storey, Heather Wastler, Aubrey M Moe

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03970005 (Evaluation of Step-Based Care for Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03970005 enrolling by invitationnot on this map

Evaluation of Step-Based Care for Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorOhio State UniversityRan2019 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsProdromal SchizophreniaArmsStep-Based Care Model
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nicholas J K BreitbordePsychiatry and Behavioral Health & Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA Nicholas.Breitborde@osumc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9877-3719
Hossam GuirgisPsychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Walter StearnsPsychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Kristen M CarpenterPsychiatry and Behavioral Health, Psychology, & Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Ghada LteifPsychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Jacob G PinePsychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Nichole StoreyPsychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Heather WastlerPsychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Aubrey M MoePsychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn October 2018, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration funded 21 sites throughout the USA to develop, implement and evaluate specialised care programmes for individuals at clinical high risk for developing a psychotic disorder (CHR-P). Per the funding requirements, such programmes were required to provide 'step-based care'-a model in which individuals are initially provided with low-intensity, non-psychosis-specific and more benign (ie, least side effects) interventions and only progress onto higher-intensity, psychosis-specific interventions with a greater risk of more severe side effects should they not meet a priori criteria for clinical response to such lower-intensity interventions. Here, we outline the evaluation component of the step-based care programme for individuals at CHR-P at The Ohio State University Early Psychosis Intervention Center (EPICENTER). METHODS AND ANALYSES: The EPICENTER CHR-P programme provides a step-based care model comprising psychotherapy, medication management, family support/education, peer support and vocational/educational support. All participants who opt to receive care at the EPICENTER will complete a standardised assessment battery as part of usual care. This battery will be administered on enrolment and will be re-administered at 6-month intervals throughout individuals' participation in EPICENTER clinical services. Participants will have the opportunity to allow for data from these usual care assessments to be used as part of an evaluation project for this new clinical service. The primary outcome for this evaluation project is time to remission of symptomatic and functional deficits commonly experienced by individuals at CHR-P. Participants will also have the opportunity to participate in a supplemental research project designed to further evaluate treatment outcomes and patient characteristics among individuals participating in EPICENTER clinical services. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This project was approved by The Ohio State University Institutional Review Board. Results from this project will be disseminated through publications and presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03970005; Pre-results.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntipsychotic AgentsChildFamilyFemaleHumansMaleMental Health ServicesOhioParentsPeer GroupPsychotherapyPsychotic DisordersResearch DesignRisk FactorsAntipsychotic Agentsmental healthpsychiatryschizophrenia & psychotic disorders

Identifiers

PMID31992606
PMCPMC7045181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.