ArticleBMJ open2020
Is telehealthcare for heart failure patients cost-effective? An economic evaluation alongside the Danish TeleCare North heart failure trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02860013 (Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Telemedicine for Heart Failure), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Telemedicine for Heart Failure: The Danish "TeleCare North" Pragmatic Randomized Trial
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- Economic Evaluations of Digital Health Interventions for Patients With Heart Failure: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Home-based versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Telemedicine to Support Heart Failure Patients during Social Distancing: A Systematic Review.Global heart · 2022Pooled it
- The cost-effectiveness of digital health interventions: A systematic review of the literature.Frontiers in public health · 2022Pooled it
- The Effect of Noninvasive Telemonitoring for Chronic Heart Failure on Health Care Utilization: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Pooled it
- Domains and Methods Used to Assess Home Telemonitoring Scalability: Systematic Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2021Pooled it
- Telemedicine as a tool for bridging geographical inequity: insights in geospatial interactions from a study on chronic heart failure patients.BMC public health · 2024Trial
- Cost-effectiveness of noninvasive telemedical interventional management in patients with heart failure: health economic analysis of the TIM-HF2 trial.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2022Trial
- Identifying and Comparing Intervention Cost Components in Remote Patient Monitoring: A Scoping Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2026Article
- Non-Invasive Remote Monitoring in Heart Failure: Towards Wearable Devices and Artificial Intelligence Solutions : Short Title: Remote Monitoring and Wearable Devices in Heart Failure.Current heart failure reports · 2025Review
- Economic Evaluation Methodologies of Remote Patient Monitoring for Chronic Conditions: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Healthcare Professionals Perspectives on Telemedicine for Patients With Chronic Diseases: A Qualitative Study.Nursing & health sciences · 2025Article
- eHealth-supported Self-management and Telemonitoring in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Heart international · 2025Review
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospital-based heart failure care in New South Wales, Australia: a linked data cohort study.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- A scoping review on advancements in noninvasive wearable technology for heart failure management.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Cost-effectiveness of a multidimensional post-discharge disease management program for heart failure patients-economic evaluation along a one-year observation period.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of Telemonitoring in Reducing Hospitalization and Associated Costs for Patients With Heart Failure in Finland: Nonrandomized Pre-Post Telemonitoring Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2024Article
- Economic evaluation of remote patient monitoring and organizational analysis according to patient involvement: a scoping review.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2023Article
- Digital Transformation in the Diagnostics and Therapy of Cardiovascular Diseases: Comprehensive Literature Review.JMIR cardio · 2023Review
- Telemedicine in Heart Failure in the COVID-19 and Post-Pandemic Era: What Have We Learned?Biomedicines · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of telehealthcare in heart failure patients as add-on to usual care.
designA cost-utility analysis was conducted from a public payer perspective alongside the randomised controlled TeleCare North trial.
settingThe North Denmark Region, Denmark.
participantsThe study included 274 heart failure patients with self-reported New York Heart Association class II-IV.
interventionsPatients in the intervention group were provided with a Telekit consisting of a tablet, a digital blood pressure monitor, and a scale and were instructed to perform measurements one to two times a week. The responsibility of the education, instructions and monitoring of the heart failure (HF) patients was placed on municipality nurses trained in HF and telemonitoring. Both groups received usual care. OUTCOME MEASURES: Cost-effectiveness was reported as incremental net monetary benefit (NMB). A micro-costing approach was applied to evaluate the derived savings in the first year in the public health sector. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) gained were estimated using the EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Levels questionnaire at baseline and at a 1-year follow-up.
resultsData for 274 patients were included in the main analysis. The telehealthcare solution provided a positive incremental NMB of £5164. The 1-year adjusted QALY difference between the telehealthcare solution and the usual care group was 0.0034 (95% CI: -0.0711 to 0.0780). The adjusted difference in costs was -£5096 (95% CI: -8736 to -1456) corresponding to a reduction in total healthcare costs by 35%. All sensitivity analyses showed the main results were robust.
conclusionsThe TeleCare North solution for monitoring HF was highly cost-effective. There were significant cost savings on hospitalisations, primary care contacts and total costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02860013.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.