ReviewJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2020
Utility of the modified Mallampati grade and Friedman tongue position in the assessment of obstructive sleep apnea.
Review in Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of ciprofol with etomidate on the occurrence of hypotension in elderly patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled study.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Trial
- Interrater reliability between in-person and telemedicine evaluations in obstructive sleep apnea.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2021Trial
- The upper airway in obstructive sleep apnoea: state of the art.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Review
- OSA Endotyping as Targets for Treatment. How Far Have We Come?Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2026Review
- Lingual frenulum, craniofacial morphology, and obstructive sleep apnea: a mediation analysis.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2026Article
- Excessive Daytime Sleepiness and Risk of Sleep Apnea: A Retrospective Analysis of Peruvian Adults.Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH · 2026Article
- Assessing the effectiveness of the Friedman classification and its components in predicting obstructive sleep apnea: a Brazilian cross-sectional study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Article
- Management of Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnoea: Many Questions, Not Enough Answers!Journal of sleep research · 2025Review
- Sex Differences in Predictors of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Risk Among Young Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study in Colombian University Students.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- [Application of palatopharyngeal arch staging system in assessing the severity of obstructive sleep apnea and airway collapse].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025Article
- The Obstructive Sleep Apnea Physical Exam: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Review
- Understanding the clinical management of co-occurring sleep-related bruxism and obstructive sleep apnea in adults: A narrative and critical review.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2025Review
- Predicting difficult airway among diabetic adults using palm print sign: A cross-sectional study.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Comparing efficacy of the mandibular advancement device after drug-induced sleep endoscopy and continuous positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2024Article
- Influence of Curved Video Laryngoscope Blade Sizes and Patient Heights on Video Laryngoscopic Views: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- The Relationship Between Sleep, Epilepsy, and Development: a Review.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2023Review
- International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2023Review
- Palatopharyngeal Arch Staging System (PASS): Consensus about Oropharyngeal Evaluation.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Translation of obstructive sleep apnea pathophysiology and phenotypes to personalized treatment: a narrative review.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
- Tongue size matters: revisiting the Mallampati classification system in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
objectivesThe modified Mallampati (MM) grade and Friedman tongue position (FTP) are commonly used scales that assess the oropharynx during evaluation for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Though used by many practitioners, there is controversy in the literature regarding their practical utility. The goal of this review will be to review the history of how the MM and FTP were developed, to discuss current evidence for their usefulness in the workup of OSA, and to provide future direction to better understand their utility in the workup of OSA.
methodsWe searched the literature (PubMed) for the terms "modified Mallampati" and "Friedman tongue position." Articles were selected based on our study objectives emphasizing articles discussing the utility of MM and FTP in managing OSA.
conclusionsMM and FTP have the potential to be useful assessment tools in the evaluation of OSA. When performing this examination, it is important for physicians and other medical providers to understand the pitfalls of the MM and FTP including the potential difficulty in performing the exam and the lack of consistency between examiners in both the terminology and execution of this physical exam finding. Better methods to standardize the assessment are necessary to ensure consistent evaluation among individual examiners while at the same time keeping the method simple and convenient for wide use as a clinical screening tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.