Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31992281›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2020

Exploring the views of successful applicants for medical school about gender medicine using a gender-sensitive video assignment.

Joni K Scholte, Francisca W M van der Meulen, Theodora A M Teunissen, Mieke Albers, Roland F J M Laan, Cornelia R M G Fluit, Antoine L M Lagro-Janssen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joni K ScholteDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Gender & Women's Health, Radboud University Medical Center, Post box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. joni.scholte@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4827-4962
Francisca W M van der MeulenDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Gender & Women's Health, Radboud University Medical Center, Post box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Theodora A M TeunissenDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Gender & Women's Health, Radboud University Medical Center, Post box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Mieke AlbersDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Gender & Women's Health, Radboud University Medical Center, Post box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Roland F J M LaanRadboudumc Health Academy, Research in Learning and Education, Radboud University Medical Center, Post box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Cornelia R M G FluitRadboudumc Health Academy, Research in Learning and Education, Radboud University Medical Center, Post box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Antoine L M Lagro-JanssenDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Gender & Women's Health, Radboud University Medical Center, Post box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSex and gender influence health and disease outcomes, therefore, doctors should be able to deliver gender-sensitive care. To train gender-sensitive doctors, relevant sex and gender differences have to be included in medical education. In order to develop appealing, relevant, and effective education for undergraduate medical students, education should be tailored to students' level and anticipated on their ideas and assumptions. Therefore, we wanted to answer the following research questions: 1. What do aspiring medical students want to learn about gender medicine?; 2. How would they like to learn about gender medicine?; and 3. What are their ideas and assumptions about sex and gender differences in health and disease?

methodsWe performed an explorative thematic document analysis of educational assignments made by successful applicants (n = 50) during the selection procedure of their entry into medical school. To test aspirants' capacity for self-directed learning, students were asked to formulate their own study plan after they watched a video that resembled a future practical experience (a consultation with a patient). As the content of this video was gender-sensitive, the assignments of the successful applicants gave us the unique opportunity to examine aspiring medical students' views about gender medicine.

resultsAspiring medical students were eager to start their training to become gender-sensitive doctors. They believed in better care for all patients and thought doctors should obtain gender competences during their medical training. Students preferred to start with acquiring basic biomedical knowledge about differences between men and women and continue their training by developing gender-sensitive communication skills in (simulated) practical settings. Students differed in their interpretation of the gender-sensitive video, some generalized potential differences to all men and all women. Teachers were considered as important role models in learning about gender medicine.

conclusionsWe advise medical schools to teach gender medicine from the beginning of medical school, by focusing on sex differences first and adding gender related themes later on in the curriculum. As students may interpret gender-sensitive information differently, structurally embedding reflection on gender medicine with gender competent teachers is necessary.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateSchools, MedicalSex FactorsAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleNetherlandsPhysician-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchSelf-Directed Learning as TopicSex CharacteristicsStudents, MedicalYoung AdultCurriculum developmentGenderGender BiasGender medicineReflectionSexSex/gender stereotypingUndergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID31992281
PMCPMC6988225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.