Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31992258›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Study protocol the Continuing Care Project: a randomised controlled trial of a continuing care telephone intervention following residential substance dependence treatment.

Peter Kelly, Frank Deane, Amanda Baker, Gerard Byrne, Tayla Degan, Briony Osborne, Camilla Townsend, James McKay, Laura Robinson, Christopher Oldmeadow and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Peter KellySchool of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Northfields Avenue, Wollongong, New South Wales, 2522, Australia. pkelly@uow.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0500-1865
Frank DeaneSchool of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Northfields Avenue, Wollongong, New South Wales, 2522, Australia.
Amanda BakerUniversity of Newcastle, University Drive, School of Medicine and Public Health, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia.
Gerard ByrneThe Salvation Army, Chalmers Street, Redfern, New South Wales, 2016, Australia.
Tayla DeganSchool of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Northfields Avenue, Wollongong, New South Wales, 2522, Australia.
Briony OsborneSchool of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Northfields Avenue, Wollongong, New South Wales, 2522, Australia.
Camilla TownsendSchool of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Northfields Avenue, Wollongong, New South Wales, 2522, Australia.
James McKayUniversity of Pennsylvania, Market Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Laura RobinsonSchool of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Northfields Avenue, Wollongong, New South Wales, 2522, Australia.
Christopher OldmeadowHunter Medical Research Institute, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, New South, Wales, 2305, Australia.
Kenny LawsonHunter Medical Research Institute, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, New South, Wales, 2305, Australia.
Andrew SearlesHunter Medical Research Institute, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, New South, Wales, 2305, Australia.
Joanne LunnWe Help Ourselves, Rozelle, New South Wales, 2039, Australia.

Funding

NSW Ministry of Health Application 206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA priority area in the field of substance dependence treatment is reducing the rates of relapse. Previous research has demonstrated that telephone delivered continuing care interventions are both clinically and cost effective when delivered as a component of outpatient treatment. This protocol describes a NSW Health funded study that assesses the effectiveness of delivering a telephone delivered continuing care intervention for people leaving residential substance treatment in Australia. METHODS/

designAll participants will be attending residential alcohol and other drug treatment provided by The Salvation Army or We Help Ourselves. The study will be conducted as a randomised controlled trial, where participants will be randomised to one of three treatment arms. The treatment arms will be: (i) 12-session continuing care telephone intervention; (ii) 4-session continuing care telephone intervention, or (iii) continuing care plan only. Baseline assessment batteries and development of the participants' continuing care plan will be completed prior to participants being randomised to a treatment condition. Research staff blind to the treatment condition will complete follow-up assessments with participants at 3-months and 6-months after they have been discharged from their residential service. DISCUSSION: This study will provide comprehensive data on the effect of delivering the continuing care intervention for people exiting residential alcohol and other drug treatment. If shown to be effective, this intervention can be disseminated to improve the rates of relapse among people leaving residential alcohol and other drug treatment.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12618001231235. Registered on 23rd July 2018. https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=375621&isReview=true.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareResidential TreatmentTelephoneAdultAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSecondary PreventionSubstance-Related DisordersTreatment OutcomeAlcoholContinuing careMental healthMethamphetamineSubstance useTelephoneThe salvation ArmyWe help ourselves

Identifiers

PMID31992258
PMCPMC6986107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.