Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31992251›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2020

Changes in the number of suicide re-attempts in a French region since the inception of VigilanS, a regionwide program combining brief contact interventions (BCI).

Larissa Fossi Djembi, Guillaume Vaiva, Christophe Debien, Stéphane Duhem, Anne-Laure Demarty, Yves-Akoli Koudou, Antoine Messiah

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Acceptability and satisfaction withFrontiers in psychiatry · 2022
    Article
  10. Suicide reattempt in a population-wide brief contact intervention to prevent suicide attempts: The VigilanS program, France.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Larissa Fossi DjembiINSERM Research unit U-1178 "Mental Health and Public Health", Centre de recherche en Epidémiologie et santé des populations (CESP), INSERM, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Villejuif, France. larissa.fossi@inserm.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1548-8531
Guillaume VaivaINSERM Research unit U-1178 "Mental Health and Public Health", Centre de recherche en Epidémiologie et santé des populations (CESP), INSERM, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Villejuif, France.
Christophe DebienSCALab Laboratory, CNRS, UMR 9193, Université de Lille, Lille, France.
Stéphane DuhemDepartment of Adult Psychiatry, Hôpital Fontan, CHRU de Lille, Lille, France.
Anne-Laure DemartyDepartment of Adult Psychiatry, Hôpital Fontan, CHRU de Lille, Lille, France.
Yves-Akoli KoudouUMRS 1018 Centre de recherche en Epidémiologie et santé des populations (CESP) "Epidemiology of Cancer, Genes and Environment", Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Villejuif, France.
Antoine MessiahINSERM Research unit U-1178 "Mental Health and Public Health", Centre de recherche en Epidémiologie et santé des populations (CESP), INSERM, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Villejuif, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrief Contact Interventions (BCIs) after a suicide attempt (SA) are an important element of prevention against SA and suicide. They are easier to generalize to an entire population than other forms of intervention. VigilanS generalizes to a whole French region a BCI combining resource cards, telephone calls and mailings, according to a predefined algorithm. It was implemented gradually in the Nord-Pas-de-Calais (NPC), France, between 2015 and 2018. Here, we evaluate the effectiveness of VigilanS, in terms of SA reduction, using annual data collected by participating centers. Hypothesis tested: the higher the VigilanS implementation in a center (measured by penetrance), the greater the decrease in the number of SA observed in this center.

methodsThe study period was from 2014 to 2018, across all of NPC centers. We performed a series of linear regressions, each center representing a statistical unit. The outcome was the change in the number of SA, relative to the initial number, and the predictive variable was VigilanS' penetrance: number of patients included in VigilanS over the total number of SA. Search for influential points (points beyond threshold values of 3 influence criteria) and weighted least squares estimations were performed.

resultsTwenty-one centers were running VigilanS in 2018, with an average penetrance of 32%. A significant relationship was identified, showing a sharp decrease in SA as a function of penetrance (slope = - 1.13; p = 3*10

conclusionVigilanS has the potential to reduce SA. Subgroup analyzes are needed to further evaluate its effectiveness. Subgroup analyses remain to be done, in order to evaluate the specific variations of SA by group.

Indexed as

Health ResourcesAdultAftercareAlgorithmsEarly Medical InterventionFemaleFranceHumansMalePsychotherapy, BriefSuicide, AttemptedBrief contact interventionsEvaluationPreventionSuicide attempts

Identifiers

PMID31992251
PMCPMC6986096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.