Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31992219›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2020

Exoskeleton for post-stroke recovery of ambulation (ExStRA): study protocol for a mixed-methods study investigating the efficacy and acceptance of an exoskeleton-based physical therapy program during stroke inpatient rehabilitation.

Dennis R Louie, William B Mortenson, Melanie Durocher, Robert Teasell, Jennifer Yao, Janice J Eng

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02995265 nacompletednot on this map

Use of a Robotic Exoskeleton to Promote Walking Recovery After Stroke - Phase 2

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2017 to 2020Enrolled36ConditionsConditionsArmsExoskeleton Program, Usual Care Program
NCT06910254 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Overground Robot-Assisted Gait Training and Recumbent Bicycle Training on Muscle Characteristics, Falls Efficacy, and Physical Function in Patients With Subacute Stroke-Related Sarcopenia

TypeinterventionalSponsorSahmyook UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled53ConditionsStroke, Sarcopenia, Muscle Atrophy, Mobility LimitationArmsOverground Robot-Assisted Gait Training (o-RAGT), Recumbent Bicycle Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dennis R LouieGraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
William B MortensonRehabilitation Research Program, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, 212-2177 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Melanie DurocherGlenrose Rehabilitation Hospital, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Robert TeasellParkwood Institute Research, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer YaoDivision of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Janice J EngDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 212-2177 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada. janice.eng@ubc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2093-0788
Vancouver Coastal Health · CAAlberta Health Services · CAUniversity of British Columbia Hospital · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

FUNCTION OF MUTANT MYOSIN IN HYPERTROPHIC CARDIOMYOPATHYF32HL009030 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LANKFORD, EDWARD B · 1994 to 1994
–
CIHR FDN 143340Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada G-15-0009030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ability to walk is commonly reported as a top rehabilitation priority for individuals after a stroke. However, not all individuals with stroke are able to practice walking, especially those who require more assistance from their therapist to do so. Powered robotic exoskeletons are a new generation of robotic-assisted gait training devices, designed to assist lower extremity movement to allow repetitious overground walking practice. To date, minimal research has been conducted on the use of an exoskeleton for gait rehabilitation after stroke. The following research protocol aims to evaluate the efficacy and acceptability, and thus adoptability, of an exoskeleton-based gait rehabilitation program for individuals with stroke.

methodsThis research protocol describes a prospective, multi-center, mixed-methods study comprised of a randomized controlled trial and a nested qualitative study. Forty adults with subacute stroke will be recruited from three inpatient rehabilitation hospitals and randomized to receive either the exoskeleton-based gait rehabilitation program or usual physical therapy care. The primary outcome measure is the Functional Ambulation Category at post-intervention, and secondary outcomes include motor recovery, functional mobility, cognitive, and quality-of-life measures. Outcome data will be collected at baseline, post-intervention, and at 6 months. The qualitative component will explore the experience and acceptability of using a powered robotic exoskeleton for stroke rehabilitation from the point of view of individuals with stroke and physical therapists. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with participants who receive the exoskeleton intervention, and with the therapists who provide the intervention. Qualitative data will be analyzed using interpretive description. DISCUSSION: This study will be the first mixed-methods study examining the adoptability of exoskeleton-based rehabilitation for individuals with stroke. It will provide valuable information regarding the efficacy of exoskeleton-based training for walking recovery and will shed light on how physical therapists and patients with stroke perceive the device. The findings will help guide the integration of robotic exoskeletons into clinical practice.

trial registrationNCT02995265 (clinicaltrials.gov), Registered 16 December 2016.

Indexed as

Exoskeleton DeviceResearch DesignAdultFemaleGait Disorders, NeurologicHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedPhysical Therapy ModalitiesProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStrokeStroke RehabilitationWalkingClinical trialExoskeletonRehabilitationStrokeWalking

Identifiers

PMID31992219
PMCPMC6988257
OpenAlexW3003471954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.