Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31992216›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2020

Schistosoma and Strongyloides screening in migrants initiating HIV Care in Canada: a cross sectional study.

Jessica McLellan, M John Gill, Stephen Vaughan, Bonnie Meatherall

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 57% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Concomitant Serological and Molecular Methods forTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical Spectrum of Schistosomiasis: An Update.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica McLellanDepartment of Medicine, The University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. jessica.mclellan@albertahealthservices.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5486-9620
M John GillDepartment of Medicine, The University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Stephen VaughanDepartment of Medicine, The University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Bonnie MeatherallDepartment of Medicine, The University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
University of Calgary · CAAlberta Health Services · CA

Funding

Unfunded N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing migration from Schistosoma and Strongyloides endemic to non-endemic regions, people remain at high risk for adverse sequelae from these chronic infections. HIV co-infected persons are particularly vulnerable to the serious and potentially fatal consequences of untreated helminth infection. While general screening guidelines exist for parasitic infection screening in immigrant populations, they remain silent on HIV positive populations. This study assessed the seroprevalence, epidemiology and laboratory characteristics of these two parasitic infections in a non-endemic setting in an immigrant/refugee HIV positive community.

methodsBetween February 2015 and 2018 individuals born outside of Canada receiving care at the centralized HIV clinic serving southern Alberta, Canada were screened by serology and direct stool analysis for schistosomiasis and strongyloidiasis. Canadian born persons with travel-based exposure risk factors were also screened. Epidemiologic and laboratory values were analyzed using bivariate logistic regression. We assessed the screening utility of serology, direct stool analysis, eosinophilia and hematuria.

results253 HIV positive participants were screened. The prevalence of positive serology for Schistosoma and Strongyloides was 19.9 and 4.4%, respectively. Age between 40 and 50 years (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.13-5.50), refugee status (3.55, 1.72-7.33), country of origin within Africa (6.15, 2.44-18.60), eosinophilia (3.56, 1.25-10.16) and CD4 count < 200 cells/mm

conclusionPositive Schistosoma and Strongyloides serology was common in this migrant HIV positive population receiving HIV care in Southern Alberta. This supports the value of routine parasitic screening as part of standard HIV care in non-endemic areas. Given the high morbidity and mortality in this relatively immunosuppressed population, especially for Strongyloides infection, screening should include both serologic and direct parasitological tests. Eosinophilia and hematuria should not be used for Schistosoma and Strongyloides serologic screening in HIV positive migrants in non-endemic settings.

Indexed as

AdultAIDS-Related Opportunistic InfectionsAlbertaCD4 Lymphocyte CountCross-Sectional StudiesEmigrants and ImmigrantsEosinophiliaFecesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansImmunocompromised HostMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPrevalenceEosinophiliaHIVImmigrantSchistosomaScreeningSeroprevalenceStrongyloides

Identifiers

PMID31992216
PMCPMC6986152
OpenAlexW3003830722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.