Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31992203›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020

Cost-Constrained feature selection in binary classification: adaptations for greedy forward selection and genetic algorithms.

Rudolf Jagdhuber, Michel Lang, Arnulf Stenzl, Jochen Neuhaus, Jörg Rahnenführer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rudolf JagdhuberDepartment of Statistics, TU Dortmund, Vogelpothsweg 87, Dortmund, 44227, Germany.
Michel LangDepartment of Statistics, TU Dortmund, Vogelpothsweg 87, Dortmund, 44227, Germany.
Arnulf StenzlKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, Tübingen, 72076, Germany.
Jochen NeuhausUniversitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Department für Operative Medizin, Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Liebigstr. 20, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.
Jörg RahnenführerDepartment of Statistics, TU Dortmund, Vogelpothsweg 87, Dortmund, 44227, Germany. rahnenfuehrer@statistik.tu-dortmund.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8947-440X

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Project RA 870/7-1, and Collaborative Research Center SFB 876, A3Horizon 2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Grant No. 721746
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith modern methods in biotechnology, the search for biomarkers has advanced to a challenging statistical task exploring high dimensional data sets. Feature selection is a widely researched preprocessing step to handle huge numbers of biomarker candidates and has special importance for the analysis of biomedical data. Such data sets often include many input features not related to the diagnostic or therapeutic target variable. A less researched, but also relevant aspect for medical applications are costs of different biomarker candidates. These costs are often financial costs, but can also refer to other aspects, for example the decision between a painful biopsy marker and a simple urine test. In this paper, we propose extensions to two feature selection methods to control the total amount of such costs: greedy forward selection and genetic algorithms. In comprehensive simulation studies of binary classification tasks, we compare the predictive performance, the run-time and the detection rate of relevant features for the new proposed methods and five baseline alternatives to handle budget constraints.

resultsIn simulations with a predefined budget constraint, our proposed methods outperform the baseline alternatives, with just minor differences between them. Only in the scenario without an actual budget constraint, our adapted greedy forward selection approach showed a clear drop in performance compared to the other methods. However, introducing a hyperparameter to adapt the benefit-cost trade-off in this method could overcome this weakness.

conclusionsIn feature cost scenarios, where a total budget has to be met, common feature selection algorithms are often not suitable to identify well performing subsets for a modelling task. Adaptations of these algorithms such as the ones proposed in this paper can help to tackle this problem.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBiomarkersComputational BiologyBiomarkersBudget constraintCost limitFeature costFeature selectionGenetic algorithm

Identifiers

PMID31992203
PMCPMC6986087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.