Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31992202›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2020

Identifying critical state of complex diseases by single-sample Kullback-Leibler divergence.

Jiayuan Zhong, Rui Liu, Pei Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
32.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 473 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Urinary biomarkers for lung cancer detection.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Tipping the Balance: A Criticality Perspective.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Single-cell transcriptomics revealMolecular therapy oncolytics · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jiayuan ZhongSchool of Mathematics, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510640, China.
Rui LiuSchool of Mathematics, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510640, China. scliurui@scut.edu.cn.
Pei ChenSchool of Mathematics, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510640, China. chenpei@scut.edu.cn.
South China University of Technology · CN

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2019MS111National Outstanding Youth Science Fund Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China Nos. 11771152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeveloping effective strategies for signaling the pre-disease state of complex diseases, a state with high susceptibility before the disease onset or deterioration, is urgently needed because such state usually followed by a catastrophic transition into a worse stage of disease. However, it is a challenging task to identify such pre-disease state or tipping point in clinics, where only one single sample is available and thus results in the failure of most statistic approaches.

methodsIn this study, we presented a single-sample-based computational method to detect the early-warning signal of critical transition during the progression of complex diseases. Specifically, given a set of reference samples which were regarded as background, a novel index called single-sample Kullback-Leibler divergence (sKLD), was proposed to explore and quantify the disturbance on the background caused by a case sample. The pre-disease state is then signaled by the significant change of sKLD.

resultsThe novel algorithm was developed and applied to both numerical simulation and real datasets, including lung squamous cell carcinoma, lung adenocarcinoma, stomach adenocarcinoma, thyroid carcinoma, colon adenocarcinoma, and acute lung injury. The successful identification of pre-disease states and the corresponding dynamical network biomarkers for all six datasets validated the effectiveness and accuracy of our method.

conclusionsThe proposed method effectively explores and quantifies the disturbance on the background caused by a case sample, and thus characterizes the criticality of a biological system. Our method not only identifies the critical state or tipping point at a single sample level, but also provides the sKLD-signaling markers for further practical application. It is therefore of great potential in personalized pre-disease diagnosis.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionDisease SusceptibilityBiomarkersComputational BiologyGene OntologyHumansReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness IndexBiomarkersCritical transitionDynamic network biomarker (DNB)Pre-disease stateSingle-sample Kullback–Leibler divergence (sKLD)Tipping point

Identifiers

PMID31992202
PMCPMC6988219
OpenAlexW3004295003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.