Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31992183›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2020

Diverse biological processes coordinate the transcriptional response to nutritional changes in a Drosophila melanogaster multiparent population.

E Ng'oma, P A Williams-Simon, A Rahman, E G King

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Late-life shift in caloric intake affects fly metabolism and longevity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Phenotyping ofBiomolecules · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. QuantifyingBiology open · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

E Ng'omaUniversity of Missouri, 401 Tucker Hall, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA. ngomae@missouri.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6741-7922
P A Williams-SimonUniversity of Missouri, 401 Tucker Hall, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1947-476X
A RahmanUniversity of Missouri, 401 Tucker Hall, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
E G KingUniversity of Missouri, 401 Tucker Hall, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9393-4720

Funding

Coordinating nutrition and energy allocation: mechanisms and evolutionR01GM117135 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI KING, ELIZABETH GRIEP · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
National Institute of Health (US) NIH R01 GM117135National Science Foundation (US) NSF IOS 1654866NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM117135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnvironmental variation in the amount of resources available to populations challenge individuals to optimize the allocation of those resources to key fitness functions. This coordination of resource allocation relative to resource availability is commonly attributed to key nutrient sensing gene pathways in laboratory model organisms, chiefly the insulin/TOR signaling pathway. However, the genetic basis of diet-induced variation in gene expression is less clear.

resultsTo describe the natural genetic variation underlying nutrient-dependent differences, we used an outbred panel derived from a multiparental population, the Drosophila Synthetic Population Resource. We analyzed RNA sequence data from multiple female tissue samples dissected from flies reared in three nutritional conditions: high sugar (HS), dietary restriction (DR), and control (C) diets. A large proportion of genes in the experiment (19.6% or 2471 genes) were significantly differentially expressed for the effect of diet, and 7.8% (978 genes) for the effect of the interaction between diet and tissue type (LRT, P

conclusionsOur results suggest that a more diverse network of pathways and gene networks mediate the diet response in our population. These results have important implications for future studies focusing on diet responses in natural populations.

Indexed as

Animal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaGene Expression RegulationTranscription, GeneticAnimal FeedAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGene Expression ProfilingSignal TransductionTranscriptomeDrosophila ProteinsDiet effectsDifferential gene expressionDrosophila melanogasterGene co-expressionGene set enrichmentMultiparent population

Identifiers

PMID31992183
PMCPMC6988245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.