Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31992172›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2020

Recurrent mutualism breakdown events in a legume rhizobia metapopulation.

Kelsey A Gano-Cohen, Camille E Wendlandt, Khadija Al Moussawi, Peter J Stokes, Kenjiro W Quides, Alexandra J Weisberg, Jeff H Chang, Joel L Sachs

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The evolution of cheating in viruses.Nature communications · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The study of host-microbiome (co)evolution across levels of selection.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kelsey A Gano-CohenDepartment of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.
Camille E WendlandtDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.
Khadija Al MoussawiDepartment of Evolution Ecology and Organismal Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.
Peter J StokesDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.
Kenjiro W QuidesDepartment of Evolution Ecology and Organismal Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.
Alexandra J WeisbergDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Jeff H ChangDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Joel L SachsDepartment of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.
University of California, Riverside · USOregon State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial mutualists generate major fitness benefits for eukaryotes, reshaping the host phenotype and its interactions with the environment. Yet, microbial mutualist populations are predicted to generate mutants that defect from providing costly services to hosts while maintaining the capacity to exploit host resources. Here, we examined the mutualist service of symbiotic nitrogen fixation in a metapopulation of root-nodulating

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionBradyrhizobiumFabaceaeRhizobiumRoot Nodules, PlantSymbiosischeatingevolutionary instabilityhost controlinterspecific conflictmutualism breakdown

Identifiers

PMID31992172
PMCPMC7015337
OpenAlexW3003434251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.