Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31991862›Full record

SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Inertial Sensor-Based Lower Limb Joint Kinematics: A Methodological Systematic Review.

Ive Weygers, Manon Kok, Marco Konings, Hans Hallez, Henri De Vroey, Kurt Claeys

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Nutrients · 2026
    Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ive WeygersKU Leuven Campus Bruges, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, 8200 Bruges, Belgium.
Manon KokTU Delft, Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands.
Marco KoningsKU Leuven Campus Bruges, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, 8200 Bruges, Belgium.
Hans HallezKU Leuven Campus Bruges, Department of Computer Science, Mechatronics Research Group, 8200 Bruges, Belgium.
Henri De VroeyKU Leuven Campus Bruges, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, 8200 Bruges, Belgium.
Kurt ClaeysKU Leuven Campus Bruges, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, 8200 Bruges, Belgium.

Funding

European Regional Development Fund 1047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of inertial measurement units (IMUs) has gained popularity for the estimation of lower limb kinematics. However, implementations in clinical practice are still lacking. The aim of this review is twofold-to evaluate the methodological requirements for IMU-based joint kinematic estimation to be applicable in a clinical setting, and to suggest future research directions. Studies within the PubMed, Web Of Science and EMBASE databases were screened for eligibility, based on the following inclusion criteria: (1) studies must include a methodological description of how kinematic variables were obtained for the lower limb, (2) kinematic data must have been acquired by means of IMUs, (3) studies must have validated the implemented method against a golden standard reference system. Information on study characteristics, signal processing characteristics and study results was assessed and discussed. This review shows that methods for lower limb joint kinematics are inherently application dependent. Sensor restrictions are generally compensated with biomechanically inspired assumptions and prior information. Awareness of the possible adaptations in the IMU-based kinematic estimates by incorporating such prior information and assumptions is necessary, before drawing clinical decisions. Future research should focus on alternative validation methods, subject-specific IMU-based biomechanical joint models and disturbed movement patterns in real-world settings.

Indexed as

Biomechanical PhenomenaGaitHumansJointsLower ExtremityMonitoring, PhysiologicSignal Processing, Computer-Assistedinertial measurement unitlower quadrantmovement analysisoutside laboratorysensor fusion

Identifiers

PMID31991862
PMCPMC7038336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.