Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31991855›Full record

ArticleVaccines2020

Determining Factors for Pertussis Vaccination Policy: A Study in Five EU Countries.

Anabelle Wong, Annick Opinel, Simon Jean-Baptiste Combes, Julie Toubiana, Sylvain Brisse

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anabelle WongInstitut Pasteur/INSERM/University of Versailles Saint Quentin, UMR 1181 Biostatistics, Biomathematics, Pharmacoepidemiology and Infectious Diseases, 25 rue du Dr Roux, F-75724 Paris CEDEX 15, France.
Annick OpinelInstitut Pasteur/INSERM/University of Versailles Saint Quentin, UMR 1181 Biostatistics, Biomathematics, Pharmacoepidemiology and Infectious Diseases, 25 rue du Dr Roux, F-75724 Paris CEDEX 15, France.
Simon Jean-Baptiste CombesUniv Rennes, EHESP, CNRS, ARENES - UMR 6051, F-35000 Rennes, France.
Julie ToubianaInstitut Pasteur, Unit Biodiversity and Epidemiology of Bacterial Pathogens, 25 rue du Dr Roux, F-75724 Paris CEDEX 15, France.
Sylvain BrisseInstitut Pasteur, Unit Biodiversity and Epidemiology of Bacterial Pathogens, 25 rue du Dr Roux, F-75724 Paris CEDEX 15, France.
Inserm · FRInstitut Pasteur · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

Institut Pasteur ANR-16-CONV-0005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pertussis vaccination policy varies across Europe, not only in the type of vaccine-whole cell (wP) vs. acellular (aP1/2/3/5)-but also in the schedule and recommendation for parents. This study aims to investigate the determining factors for the type of vaccine, immunization schedule and maternal immunization recommendation. From March to May 2019, experts in national health agencies and major academic or research institutions from Denmark, France, Poland, Sweden and the UK were invited to a semi-structured interview. Thematic analysis was performed on the transcripts using a codebook formulated by three coders. Inter-coder agreement was assessed. Fifteen expert interviews were conducted. The identified driving factors for pertussis vaccine policy were classified into three domains: scientific factors, sociological factors, and pragmatic factors. The determining factors for the type of vaccine were prescriber's preference, concern of adverse events following immunization (AEFI), effectiveness, and consideration of other vaccine components in combined vaccines. The determining factors for infant schedule were immunity response and the potential to improve coverage and timeliness. The determining factors for maternal immunization were infant mortality and public acceptability. To conclude, socio-political and pragmatic factors were, besides scientific factors, important in determining the pertussis vaccine type, schedule of childhood immunization and recommendations for parents.

Indexed as

Bordetella pertussisnational immunization programvaccination policywhooping cough

Identifiers

PMID31991855
PMCPMC7158661
OpenAlexW3002183047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.