ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020
Genomics Education in the Era of Personal Genomics: Academic, Professional, and Public Considerations.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge, attitudes, and training on genetic testing among public health professionals and students in the United Arab Emirates: a qualitative study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- "It was up to me to be curious": perceptions and experiences of students with intellectual disability on genetics and health education.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- A multidisciplinary perspective on advancing genomic nursing in Portugal: roles, barriers and system-level solutions.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- Preparedness for working with genomic medicine among Swedish non-genetics physicians - a nation-wide survey study.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- Self-assessed knowledge of genomic medicine among non-genetics physicians - results from a nationwide Swedish survey.Journal of community genetics · 2025Article
- Developing genetic literacy in high school students with intellectual disability: Teachers' experiences and perspectives.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
- Genomics as part of Portuguese undergraduate nursing programs: are we moving in the right direction?Journal of community genetics · 2025Article
- A genomics learning framework for undergraduates.PloS one · 2025Article
- Analysis of Nursing Education Curricula in Spain: Integration of Genetic and Genomic Concepts.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024Review
- Evaluating an e-learning course's impact and challenges on genomic literacy among medical professionals.International journal of medical education · 2024Article
- Integration of genomic nursing in nursing education curriculum in Indonesia: A perspective.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2024Article
- Pairing a bioinformatics-focused course-based undergraduate research experience with specifications grading in an introductory biology classroom.Biology methods & protocols · 2024Article
- Assessing genomics confidence and learning needs in Australian nurses and midwives: an educational program evaluation.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- It is time to authenticate the Microbiome Sciences with accredited educational programs and departments.PLoS biology · 2023Article
- A Scoping Review: Do instruments measuring genomic competence in nursing incorporate ethics?Nursing open · 2023Article
- The implementation of large-scale genomic screening or diagnostic programmes: A rapid evidence review.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2023Review
- Article
- CIViCdb 2022: evolution of an open-access cancer variant interpretation knowledgebase.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Development of Competency-based Online Genomic Medicine Training (COGENT).Personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Investigation of Biomedical Students' Attitudes toward Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine: A Cross-Sectional Study.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the completion of the Human Genome Project in 2003, genomic sequencing has become a prominent tool used by diverse disciplines in modern science. In the past 20 years, the cost of genomic sequencing has decreased exponentially, making it affordable and accessible. Bioinformatic and biological studies have produced significant scientific breakthroughs using the wealth of genomic information now available. Alongside the scientific benefit of genomics, companies offer direct-to-consumer genetic testing which provide health, trait, and ancestry information to the public. A key area that must be addressed is education about what conclusions can be made from this genomic information and integrating genomic education with foundational genetic principles already taught in academic settings. The promise of personal genomics providing disease treatment is exciting, but many challenges remain to validate genomic predictions and diagnostic correlations. Ethical and societal concerns must also be addressed regarding how personal genomic information is used. This genomics revolution provides a powerful opportunity to educate students, clinicians, and the public on scientific and ethical issues in a personal way to increase learning. In this review, we discuss the influence of personal genomics in society and focus on the importance and benefits of genomics education in the classroom, clinics, and the public and explore the potential consequences of personal genomic education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.