Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31991402›Full record

ArticleAging2020

Clinical outcome of transurethral enucleation of the prostate using the 120-W thulium Laser (Vela™ XL) compared to bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in aging male.

Chen-Pang Hou, Yu-Hsiang Lin, Horng-Heng Juang, Phei-Lang Chang, Chien-Lun Chen, Pei-Shan Yang, Ke-Hung Tsui

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effect of mind map-guided nursing on pain control after transurethral resection of the prostate.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Comparison of Outcome and Quality of Life Between Thulium Laser (VelaTherapeutics and clinical risk management · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chen-Pang HouDepartment of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Yu-Hsiang LinDepartment of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Horng-Heng JuangDepartment of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Phei-Lang ChangDepartment of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Chien-Lun ChenDepartment of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Pei-Shan YangDepartment of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Ke-Hung TsuiDepartment of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Chang Gung University · TWChang Gung Memorial Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compared the surgical outcomes of the 120-W Thulium laser (Vela™ XL) enucleation of the prostate and bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in terms of efficacy, safety, and improvements of quality of life (QoL) in patients with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). Records were obtained from January 2014 to September 2018 for selected patients with symptomatic BPH who underwent 120-W Thulium laser (Vela™XL) prostate enucleation and bipolar TURP in our institution. All the patients selected met the surgical criteria for TURP and had received medical treatment for at least 3 months. Patients were excluded if their ECOG performance status was >1, if they had active malignant disease, of if they had a history of prostate surgery or reconstruction surgery of the urinary system. Patients decided which treatment option would be performed. Both the procedures were conducted by a single surgeon. Clinical outcomes such as changes in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) score, urodynamic parameters, drug consumption, pain scores, and QoL were evaluated. The rate of urinary tract infection, recatheterization, additional analgesic requirement, return to the emergency department for treatment, and other surgical complications was analyzed and compared between the two cohorts. A total of 276 patients met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 141 patients received bipolar TURP, where as 135 decided to receive laser vaporesection. No significant difference was observed in age, PSA level, prostate volume, and comorbidities between the two cohorts. Pre-operative (pre-op) urodynamic parameters were also identical, except that the laser surgery group had a higher rate of admission with a urinary catheter (24.4%

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsComorbidityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProstatic HyperplasiaQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesTransurethral Resection of ProstateTreatment Outcomeagingbenign prostate hyperplasiabladder outlet obstructionlaser

Identifiers

PMID31991402
PMCPMC7053585
OpenAlexW3003364686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.