Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31991031›Full record

ArticleColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2020

Using machine learning to construct nomograms for patients with metastatic colon cancer.

B Zhao, R A Gabriel, F Vaida, S Eisenstein, G T Schnickel, J K Sicklick, B M Clary

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. MOFR: Multi-omics Feature Reconstruction for Cancer Classification and Metastasis Prediction.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Nomogram to Predict the Overall Survival of Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Multicenter National Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

B ZhaoDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2181-3783
R A GabrielDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
F VaidaDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
S EisensteinDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
G T SchnickelDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
J K SicklickDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
B M ClaryDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
University of California San Diego · US

Funding

San Diego Biomedical Informatics Education & Research (SABER)T15LM011271 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SHAMIM NEMATI · 2012 to 2026
$9.7M
NLM NIH HHS T15 LM011271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimPatients with synchronous colon cancer metastases have highly variable overall survival (OS), making accurate predictive models challenging to build. We aim to use machine learning to more accurately predict OS in these patients and to present this predictive model in the form of nomograms for patients and clinicians.

methodsUsing the National Cancer Database (2010-2014), we identified right colon (RC) and left colon (LC) cancer patients with synchronous metastases. Each primary site was split into training and testing datasets. Nomograms predicting 3- year OS were created for each site using Cox proportional hazard regression with lasso regression. Each model was evaluated by both calibration (comparison of predicted vs observed OS) and validation (degree of concordance as measured by the c-index) methodologies.

resultsA total of 11 018 RC and 8346 LC patients were used to construct and validate the nomograms. After stratifying each model into five risk groups, the predicted OS was within the 95% CI of the observed OS in four out of five risk groups for both the RC and LC models. Externally validated c-indexes at 3 years for the RC and LC models were 0.794 and 0.761, respectively.

conclusionsUtilization of machine learning can result in more accurate predictive models for patients with metastatic colon cancer. Nomograms built from these models can assist clinicians and patients in the shared decision-making process of their cancer care.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsRectal NeoplasmsHumansMachine LearningNomogramsPrognosiscolon cancermachine learningmetastasisNCDBnomogram

Identifiers

PMID31991031
PMCPMC8722819
OpenAlexW3004300135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.