ArticleGlobal change biology2020
Impact of forest plantation on methane emissions from tropical peatland.
Article in Global change biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Long-term effects of nitrogen fertilization on methane emissions in drained tropical peatland.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Fate of methane in canals draining tropical peatlands.Nature communications · 2024Article
- CHGlobal change biology · 2023Article
- Short-lived peaks of stem methane emissions from mature black alder (Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2021Article
- Impact of forest plantation on methane emissions from tropical peatland.Global change biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tropical peatlands are a known source of methane (CH
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.