ArticlePloS one2020
Fragmentation and low density as major conservation challenges for the southernmost populations of the European wildcat.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Checking Wilderness Through Conservation Genetics: The Case of the European Wildcat in the Central Apennines, Italy.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Assessment of spatial and temporal overlap between wildcats (Journal of mammalogy · 2026Article
- Identification ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Habitat Suitability and Relative Abundance of the European Wildcat (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Modelling the Distribution and Habitat Suitability of the European Wildcat (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Assessing Changes in the Distribution Patterns of the European Wildcat in Hungary.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Thelazia callipaeda as a potential new threat to european wildcats: insights from an eco-epidemiological study.Veterinary research communications · 2023Article
- Prevalence ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Spatial Ecology and Diel Activity of European Wildcat (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- First Description of Sarcoptic Mange in a Free-Ranging European Wildcat (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Do all roads lead to resistance? State road density is the main impediment to gene flow in a flagship species inhabiting a severely fragmented anthropogenic landscape.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Spatial capture-recapture with multiple noninvasive marks: An application to camera-trapping data of the European wildcat (Ecology and evolution · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Knowledge of population dynamics of threatened species in the wild is key to effective conservation actions. However, at present, there are many examples of endangered animals for which their current situation is unknown, and not just in remote areas and less developed countries. We have explored this topic by studying the paradigmatic case of the European wildcat (Felis silvestris silvestris), an endangered small carnivore whose status has been subjectively established on the basis of non-systematic approaches and opportunistic records. Little is known about its demographic situation, prompting the need for information to improve conservation measures. However, the secretive behaviour of felines along with its low density in natural conditions have prevented the gathering of sufficient data. We developed a field sampling strategy for one of the largest populations (Andalusia, South Spain, 87,268 km2), based on a logistically viable systematic non-intrusive survey by camera-trapping. This study offers the first large-scale estimation for any European wildcat population, based on analytical approaches applied on Species Distribution Models. A hierarchical approach based on a Maxent model for distribution estimation was used, along with Generalised Linear Models for density estimation from explicit spatial capture-recapture data. Our results show that the distribution range is smaller and more highly fragmented than previously assumed. The overall estimated density was very low (0.069 ±0.0019 wildcats/km2) and the protected areas network seems to be insufficient to cover a significant part of the population or a viable nucleus in demographic terms. Indeed, the most important areas remain unprotected. Our main recommendations are to improve the protected area network and/or vigilance programs in hunting estates, in addition to studying and improving connectivity between the main population patches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.