Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31990915›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Insight into the resilience and susceptibility of marine bacteria to T6SS attack by Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio coralliilyticus.

Ryan Guillemette, Blake Ushijima, Mihika Jalan, Claudia C Häse, Farooq Azam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Complete genome sequences ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025
    Article
  4. Quorum sensing regulates virulence factors in the coral pathogenApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  16. Complete Genome Sequence of Vibrio coralliilyticus OCN008.Microbiology resource announcements · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Disease Diagnostics and Potential Coinfections byFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  19. Gut microbes
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ryan GuillemetteMarine Biology Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2433-8439
Blake UshijimaCarlson College of Veterinary Medicine, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States of America.
Mihika JalanMarine Biology Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, United States of America.
Claudia C HäseCarlson College of Veterinary Medicine, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States of America.
Farooq AzamMarine Biology Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, United States of America.
Scripps Institution of Oceanography · USOregon State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The type VI secretion system (T6SS) is a nanomachine capable of killing adjacent microbial cells in a contact-dependent manner. Due to limited studies, relatively little is known about the range of marine bacteria that are susceptible to T6SS attack. Here, 15 diverse marine bacterial isolates from the phyla Bacteroidetes and Ɣ-Proteobacteria were challenged against the marine bacterium and human pathogen, Vibrio cholerae, which has a well described T6SS. V. cholerae killed several of the tested Ɣ-Proteobacteria, including members of the orders Vibrionales, Alteromonadales, Oceanospirillales, and Pseudomonadales. In contrast, V. cholerae co-existed with multiple Bacteroidetes and Ɣ-Proteobacteria isolates, but was killed by Vibrio coralliilyticus. Follow-up experiments revealed that five V. coralliilyticus strains, including known coral and shellfish pathogens survived the T6SS challenge and killed V. cholerae. By using predicted protein comparisons and mutagenesis, we conclude that V. coralliilyticus protected itself in the challenge by using its own T6SS to kill V. cholerae. This study provides valuable insight into the resilience and susceptibility of marine bacteria to the V. cholerae T6SS, and provides the first evidence for a functional T6SS in V. coralliilyticus, both of which have implications for human and ocean health.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnthozoaAntibodies, BacterialBacterial ProteinsBacteroidetesGene Expression Regulation, BacterialProteobacteriaShellfishType VI Secretion SystemsVibrioVibrio choleraeAntibodies, BacterialBacterial ProteinsType VI Secretion Systems

Identifiers

PMID31990915
PMCPMC6986712
OpenAlexW3004222830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.