Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31990747›Full record

ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.)

Utility and Feasibility of Teleophthalmology Using a Smartphone-Based Ophthalmic Camera in Screening Camps in Nepal.

Sean Collon, David Chang, Geoffrey Tabin, Karen Hong, David Myung, Suman Thapa

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Smartphone-based fundus imaging: applications and adapters].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Clinically useful smartphone ophthalmic imaging techniques.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sean CollonJohn A. Moran Eye Center at University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
David ChangLos Altos Eye Physicians, Los Altos, CA.
Geoffrey TabinByers Eye Institute at Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
Karen HongWashington University School of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
David MyungByers Eye Institute at Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
Suman ThapaTilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute · USStanford University · USTilganga Institute of Ophthalmology · NPUniversity of Utah · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey L Goldberg · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine whether use of a mobile device-based ophthalmic camera by ophthalmic technicians (OTs) in village screening camps in Nepal followed by remote image interpretation by an ophthalmologist can improve detection of ocular pathology and medical decision-making.

designEvaluation of mobile device-based ophthalmic camera through study of before and after clinical decision-making.

methodsOne hundred forty patients over 18 years of age presenting to remote screening camps with best-corrected visual acuity ≤20/60 in one or both eyes were enrolled. Participants were examined by an OT with direct ophthalmoscopy. The technician recorded a diagnosis for each eye and a disposition for each patient. Patients then had anterior segment and fundus photos and/or videos taken using a smartphone-based ophthalmic camera system. Photos and videos were uploaded to a secure, HIPAA-compliant, cloud-based server, and interpreted by masked ophthalmologists from XXX, who independently recorded diagnoses and a disposition for each patient.

resultsThe diagnoses given by OTs and ophthalmologists differed in 42.4% of eyes. Diagnosis agreement was highest for cataract [k = 0.732, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-0.81], but much lower for posterior segment (retina/optic nerve) pathology (k = 0.057, 95% CI -0.03-0.14). Ophthalmologists and OTs suggested different dispositions for 68.6% of patients. Agreement was highest for cataract extraction (k = 0.623, 95% CI 0.49-0.75), whereas agreement for referral to XXX was lower (k = 0.12, 95% CI 0.00-0.24).

conclusionsRemote ophthalmologist consultation utilizing a mobile device ophthalmic camera system is logistically feasible, easily scalable, and capable of capturing high-quality images in the setting of rural eye screening camps. Although OTs are well equipped to identify and triage anterior segment pathology, this technology may be helpful in the detection of and referral for posterior segment pathology.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overEye DiseasesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedMobile Health UnitsNepalOphthalmologyOphthalmoscopyPhotographySmartphone

Identifiers

PMID31990747
PMCPMC7004467
OpenAlexW3013085503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.