ReviewCurrent opinion in gastroenterology2020
Routine disaccharidase testing: are we there yet?
Review in Current opinion in gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnosing Congenital Sucrase-Isomaltase Deficiency in Children: An Algorithm Using Combined Breath Testing.Pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition · 2026Article
- Disaccharidase Enzyme Deficiency in Adult Patients With Gas and Bloating.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Getting the BS out of Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea (IBS-D): Let's Make a Diagnosis.Current gastroenterology reports · 2024Review
- Intestinal Disaccharidase Deficiency in Adults: Evaluation and Treatment.Current gastroenterology reports · 2023Review
- Application of The FODMAP Diet in a Paediatric Setting.Nutrients · 2022Review
- Maldigestion Versus Malabsorption in the Elderly.Current gastroenterology reports · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewDisaccharidase testing, as applied to the evaluation of gastrointestinal disturbances is available but it is not routinely considered in the diagnostic work-up. The purpose of this review was to determine if disaccharidase testing is clinically useful and to consider how the results could alter patient management. RECENT
findingsIndicate that carbohydrate maldigestion could contribute functional bowel disorders and negatively impact the fecal microbiome. Diagnostic techniques include enzyme activity assays performed on random endoscopically obtained small intestinal biopsies, immunohistochemistry, stable isotope tracer and nonenriched substrate load breath testing, and genetic testing for mutations. More than 40 sucrase--isomaltase gene variants coding for defective or reduced enzymatic activity have been reported and deficiency conditions are more common than previously thought. SUMMARY: The rationale for disaccharidase activity testing relates to a need to fully assess unexplained recurrent abdominal discomfort and associated symptoms. All disaccharidases share the same basic mechanism of mucosal expression and deficiency has far reaching consequences. Testing for disaccharidase expression appears to have an important role in symptom evaluation, but there are accuracy and logistical issues that should be considered. It is likely that specific recommendations for patient management, dietary modification, and enzyme supplementation would come from better testing methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.