ArticlePharmacology research & perspectives2020
T-495, a novel low cooperative M
Article in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Visual hallucinations in Parkinson's disease: spotlight on central cholinergic dysfunction.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Review
- Advancing depression treatment: the role of sigma receptor ligands.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
- Structure, function and drug discovery of GPCR signaling.Molecular biomedicine · 2023Review
- Allosteric modulation of G protein-coupled receptor signaling.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- Clinical and Preclinical Evidence for MNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022Article
- Multitargeting nature of muscarinic orthosteric agonists and antagonists.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Review
- Modulation of arousal and sleep/wake architecture by MNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020Article
- T-495, a novel low cooperative MPharmacology research & perspectives · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
M
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.