Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31990353›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2020

Temporal trends in age at menarche and age at menopause: a population study of 312 656 women in Norway.

M S Gottschalk, A Eskild, S Hofvind, J M Gran, E K Bjelland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. [Menstruation on YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok: a content and quality analysis].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M S GottschalkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akershus University Hospital, P.O. Box 1000, N-1478 Lørenskog, Norway.
A EskildDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akershus University Hospital, P.O. Box 1000, N-1478 Lørenskog, Norway.
S HofvindDepartment of Mammography Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, P.O. Box 5313, Majorstuen, N-0304 Oslo, Norway.
J M GranOslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Biostatistics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1122, Blindern, 0372 Oslo, Norway.
E K BjellandDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akershus University Hospital, P.O. Box 1000, N-1478 Lørenskog, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionHave mean age at menarche or mean age at natural menopause changed from the 1939 birth cohort to the 1964 birth cohort? SUMMARY ANSWER: We estimated a minor decrease in mean age at menarche and an increase by nearly 3 years in mean age at natural menopause. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: In the Western world, age at menarche decreased across birth cohorts from the early 1800s until the 1950s. Whether mean age at menarche has continued to decrease in birth cohorts after the 1950s remains uncertain. It is also uncertain whether mean age at natural menopause has changed across birth cohorts. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We performed a retrospective population study of 312 656 women who were born in Norway during the years 1936-1964. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsThe data were obtained by two self-administered questionnaires from women who participated in the Norwegian breast cancer screening program (BreastScreen Norway) during the years 2006-2014. We used flexible parametric survival models with restricted cubic splines to estimate mean age at menarche, mean age at menopause and mean number of years between menarche and menopause according to the women's year of birth. The women who were still having menstrual periods contributed with follow-up time until the time of data collection, and the women who had reported surgical removal of the uterus and/or both ovaries prior to natural menopause contributed with follow-up time until the time of surgery. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The mean age at menarche was 13.42 years (95% CI: 13.40-13.44 years) among women born during 1936-1939, and it was 13.24 years (95% CI: 13.22-13.25 years) among women born during 1960-1964. The mean age at natural menopause increased from 50.31 years (95% CI: 50.25-50.37 years) among women born during 1936-1939 to 52.73 years (95% CI: 52.64-52.82 years) among women born during 1960-1964. The mean number of years between menarche and menopause increased from 36.83 years (95% CI: 36.77-36.89 years) to 40.22 years (95% CI: 40.11-40.34 years). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Information about age at menarche and age at menopause was based on self-reports. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsLate menopause is associated with increased risk of breast cancer but also with increased life expectancy. Thus, higher mean age at menopause may partly explain the increase in breast cancer incidence after menopause and the increase in life expectancy in recent time. Also, a longer interval between menarche and menopause could suggest that the number of years of female fecundity has increased. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was funded by the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority [grant number 2016112 to M.S.G.] and by the Norwegian Cancer Society [grant number 6863294-2015 to E.K.B.]. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Indexed as

MenarcheMenopauseAge FactorsFemaleHumansNorwayRetrospective Studiesbirth cohortmenarchemenopausepopulation studysecular trend

Identifiers

PMID31990353
PMCPMC7048709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.