Observational studyBlood advances2020
Bleeding and recurrent VTE with apixaban vs warfarin as outpatient treatment: time-course and subgroup analyses.
Observational study in Blood advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Long-Term Outcomes in Two-Year Follow-Up after Primary Treatment in Patients with a Prior Venous Thromboembolic Event: A Prospective, Observational, Real-Life Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Venous Thoracic Outlet Syndrome with an Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis Caused by a Dislocated Clavicle Fracture: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2023Article
- Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban vs Warfarin in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism with Risk Factors for Bleeding or for Recurrences.Advances in therapy · 2023Article
- Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban versus Warfarin in Venous Thromboembolism Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.Thrombosis and haemostasis · 2022Article
- Effectiveness and safety of apixaban vs warfarin among venous thromboembolism patients at high-risk of bleeding.PloS one · 2022Article
- Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban vs. Warfarin in Venous Thromboembolism Patients with Obesity and Morbid Obesity.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Acute Venous Thromboembolism: Experience of a Large Tertiary Hospital in Saudi Arabia.International journal of general medicine · 2021Article
- Apixaban vs Enoxaparin for Preventing Postoperative Thromboembolic events in Women Undergoing Surgery for Gynecologic Cancers: A Randomized Clinical Trial Study.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the phase 3 trial Apixaban for the Initial Management of Pulmonary Embolism and Deep-Vein Thrombosis as First-Line Therapy, apixaban was noninferior to enoxaparin, overlapped and followed by warfarin, in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) with significantly less bleeding; in a real-world evaluation, risks for bleeding and recurrent VTE were lower with apixaban vs warfarin plus parenteral anticoagulant (PAC) bridge therapy. The present study extends this research by comparing outcomes over time and within selected subgroups. A retrospective observational cohort design and 4 US private health care claims databases were used. Study population included patients who initiated outpatient treatment with apixaban or warfarin (plus PAC bridge therapy) for VTE. Major bleeding, clinically relevant nonmajor (CRNM) bleeding, and recurrent VTE were compared during the 180-day follow-up period, at selected follow-up time points (days 21, 90, 180), and within subgroups (pulmonary embolism [PE] with or without deep vein thrombosis [DVT], DVT only, provoked VTE, unprovoked VTE) using multivariable shared frailty models. Study population consisted of 20 561 apixaban patients and 35 080 warfarin patients; baseline characteristics were comparable. Overall, at selected follow-up time points, and within the aforementioned subgroups, adjusted risks were lower among apixaban vs warfarin patients: major bleeding, by 27% to 39%, CRNM bleeding, by 17% to 28%, and recurrent VTE, by 25% to 39% (all P ≤ .01). In this real-world study of VTE patients, risks of bleeding and recurrent VTE were lower among apixaban (vs warfarin) patients during the 180-day follow-up period, at selected follow-up time points, and within subgroups defined by index VTE episode.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.