ArticleJAMA2020
Association of Isolated Diastolic Hypertension as Defined by the 2017 ACC/AHA Blood Pressure Guideline With Incident Cardiovascular Outcomes.
Article in JAMA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
92 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 158 citations in OpenAlex.
- Blood pressure lowering in isolated diastolic hypertension and cardiovascular risk: an individual patient data meta-analysis.European heart journal · 2026Pooled it
- [Elevated blood pressure and hypertension : Focus of the 2024 ESC guidelines on risk reduction].Herz · 2025Guideline
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of mindfulness-based stress reduction for arterial hypertension.Journal of human hypertension · 2023Pooled it
- A cohort study and meta-analysis of isolated diastolic hypertension: searching for a threshold to guide treatment.European heart journal · 2021Pooled it
- Isolated Diastolic Hypertension and Risk of Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies With 489,814 Participants.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Association between high blood pressure and long term cardiovascular events in young adults: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2020Pooled it
- Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With Treated Isolated Diastolic Hypertension and Isolated Low Diastolic Blood Pressure.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Trial
- Development and validation of multicentre study on novel Artificial Intelligence-based Cardiovascular Risk Score (AICVD).Family medicine and community health · 2024Trial
- Isolated Diastolic Hypertension and Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Young Adults.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2026Article
- Review
- Subtypes of Hypertension 2 to 7 Years After First Pregnancy.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2026Observational
- Takeaway Fast-Food Consumption and Elevated Diastolic Blood Pressure in US Young Adults: An Exploratory Mediation Analysis of Metabolic and Inflammatory Indicators.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Diastolic Morning Surge Improves Risk Stratification for Subclinical Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in Ambulatory-Defined Isolated Diastolic Hypertension.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2026Article
- Nocturnal Stage 1 Hypertension Defined by 2025 Guidelines in Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Mortality trends in isolated systolic, diastolic, and combined hypertension: insights from NHANES database.Clinical hypertension · 2026Article
- The insulin resistance-systemic vascular resistance-isolated diastolic hypertension axis: a metabolic framework for an overlooked hypertension phenotype.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Metabolic Improvement Mediates the Causal Relationship Between GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Myocardial Infarction: A Mendelian Randomization and Mediation Analysis Study.Diabetes care · 2026Article
- Isolated diastolic hypertension and incident cardio-renal-metabolic multimorbidity in the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study: comparison of ACC/AHA and ESC/NICE guideline definitions.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025Article
- How to measure and model cardiovascular aging.Cardiovascular research · 2025Review
- Association analysis of blood pressure with incident risks for thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms: an observational study of the UK Biobank cohort.Open heart · 2025Observational
32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
importanceIn the 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guideline, the definition of hypertension was lowered from a blood pressure (BP) of greater than or equal to 140/90 to greater than or equal to 130/80 mm Hg. The new diastolic BP threshold of 80 mm Hg was recommended based on expert opinion and changes the definition of isolated diastolic hypertension (IDH).
objectiveTo compare the prevalence of IDH in the United States, by 2017 ACC/AHA and 2003 Joint National Committee (JNC7) definitions, and to characterize cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of IDH with outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsCross-sectional analyses of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 2013-2016) and longitudinal analyses of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study (baseline 1990-1992, with follow-up through December 31, 2017). Longitudinal results were validated in 2 external cohorts: (1) the NHANES III (1988-1994) and NHANES 1999-2014 and (2) the Give Us a Clue to Cancer and Heart Disease (CLUE) II cohort (baseline 1989). EXPOSURES: IDH, by 2017 ACC/AHA (systolic BP <130 mm Hg, diastolic BP ≥80 mm Hg) and by JNC7 (systolic BP <140 mm Hg, diastolic BP ≥90 mm Hg) definitions. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Weighted estimates for prevalence of IDH in US adults and prevalence of US adults recommended BP pharmacotherapy by the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline based solely on the presence of IDH. Risk of incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), heart failure (HF), and chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the ARIC Study.
resultsThe study population included 9590 adults from the NHANES (mean [SD] baseline age, 49.6 [17.6] years; 5016 women [52.3%]) and 8703 adults from the ARIC Study (mean [SD] baseline age, 56.0 [5.6] years; 4977 women [57.2%]). The estimated prevalence of IDH in the NHANES was 6.5% by the 2017 ACC/AHA definition and 1.3% by the JNC7 definition (absolute difference, 5.2% [95% CI, 4.7%-5.7%]). Among those newly classified as having IDH, an estimated 0.6% (95% CI, 0.5%-0.6%) also met the guideline threshold for antihypertensive therapy. Compared with normotensive ARIC participants, IDH by the 2017 ACC/AHA definition was not significantly associated with incident ASCVD (n = 1386 events; median follow-up, 25.2 years; hazard ratio [HR], 1.06 [95% CI, 0.89-1.26]), HF (n = 1396 events; HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.76-1.09]), or CKD (n = 2433 events; HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.65-1.11]). Results were also null for cardiovascular mortality in the 2 external cohorts (eg, HRs of IDH by the 2017 ACC/AHA definition were 1.17 [95% CI, 0.87-1.56] in the NHANES [n = 1012 events] and 1.02 [95% CI, 0.92-1.14] in CLUE II [n = 1497 events]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this analysis of US adults, the estimated prevalence of IDH was more common when defined by the 2017 ACC/AHA BP guideline compared with the JNC7 guideline. However, IDH was not significantly associated with increased risk for cardiovascular outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.