ArticleACS chemical biology2020
Fluorescence Assessment of the AmpR-Signaling Network of
Article in ACS chemical biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcriptional regulation drives heteroresistance inmSystems · 2026Article
- The cell wall hydrolase MltG is essential to maintain cell wall homeostasis ofJournal of bacteriology · 2025Article
- Bacterial peptidoglycan as a living polymer.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2025Review
- Lytic transglycosylase Slt of Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a periplasmic hub protein.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024Article
- Bacterial virulence regulation through soluble peptidoglycan fragments sensing and response: knowledge gaps and therapeutic potential.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2023Article
- Mechanisms of Resistance to Ceftolozane/Tazobactam in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Results of the GERPA Multicenter Study.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Gram-negative bacteria have evolved an elaborate pathway to sense and respond to exposure to β-lactam antibiotics. The β-lactam antibiotics inhibit penicillin-binding proteins, whereby the loss of their activities alters/damages the cell-wall peptidoglycan. Bacteria sense this damage and remove the affected peptidoglycan into complex recycling pathways. As an offshoot of these pathways, muropeptide chemical signals generated from the cell-wall recycling manifest the production of a class C β-lactamase, which hydrolytically degrades the β-lactam antibiotic as a resistance mechanism. We disclose the use of a fluorescence probe that detects the activation of the recycling system by the formation of the key muropeptides involved in signaling. This same probe additionally detects natural-product cell-wall-active antibiotics that are produced
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.