Trial reportJPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition2021
Blinded, Double-Dummy, Parallel-Group, Phase 2a Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Highly Selective 5-Hydroxytryptamine Type 4 Receptor Agonist in Critically Ill Patients With Enteral Feeding Intolerance.
Trial report in JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01953081 (A Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacodynamics of a Single Dose of Intravenous TD-8954 Compared With Metoclopramide in Critically Ill Patients With Enteral Feeding Intolerance), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacodynamics of a Single Dose of Intravenous TD-8954 Compared With Metoclopramide in Critically Ill Patients With Enteral Feeding Intolerance
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mosapride versus Metoclopramide in Critically Ill Patients with Enteral Feeding Intolerance: A Randomized, Double-Blinded Comparison.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- The Effect of Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Intravenously Administered Felcisetrag (TAK-954).Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Trial
- Randomised study: effects of the 5-HTAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2021Trial
- Progress in Gastroparesis Management: From Pharmacotherapy to Interventional Treatments.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
- Pharmacologic treatments for gastroparesis.Pharmacological reviews · 2025Review
- Analysis of outcome indicators in clinical trials related to feeding intolerance in ICU patients receiving enteral nutrition feeding.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- The Use of Pre-Endoscopic Metoclopramide Does Not Prevent the Need for Repeat Endoscopy: A U.S. Based Retrospective Cohort Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Comparison of enteral prucaloprideFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Gastroparesis.Gastroenterology · 2022Review
- New Drugs on the Horizon for Functional and Motility Gastrointestinal Disorders.Gastroenterology · 2021Review
- New Developments in Prokinetic Therapy for Gastric Motility Disorders.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Postoperative Ileus and Postoperative Gastrointestinal Tract Dysfunction: Pathogenic Mechanisms and Novel Treatment Strategies Beyond Colorectal Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDelayed gastric emptying is the leading cause of enteral feeding intolerance (EFI) in critical illness. This phase 2a study compared TAK-954, a selective agonist of 5-hydroxytryptamine type 4 receptors, with metoclopramide in critically ill patients with EFI (NCT01953081).
methodsA blinded, double-dummy trial was conducted in mechanically ventilated patients with EFI (>200 mL gastric residual volume within 24 hours before randomization). Patients were randomized to receive either 0.5 mg intravenous TAK-954 over 1 hour then 0.9% saline injection 4 times/d (sham metoclopramide) or the active comparator 10 mg intravenous metoclopramide 4 times/d and a 1-hour 0.9% saline infusion. After initial dosing, participants received a radiolabeled meal of liquid nutrient (Ensure; 106 kcal), and gastric emptying was measured (scintigraphy). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded from the time of consent through to day 5; serious AEs were collected to day 30.
resultsThirteen patients (TAK-954, n = 7; metoclopramide, n = 6) participated. Five patients in the TAK-954 group and 4 in the metoclopramide group experienced AEs (2 and 3, respectively, were serious). All AEs except 1 (diarrhea in the metoclopramide group) were considered unrelated to study drug. Following treatment, a greater proportion of patients receiving TAK-954 had normal gastric retention (<13% retention at 180 minutes) than those receiving metoclopramide (6/7 vs 3/6 patients, respectively).
conclusionA single dose of 0.5 mg intravenous TAK-954 appears to have at least similar efficacy in accelerating gastric emptying to multiple doses of 10 mg metoclopramide and was not associated with increased AEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.