Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31989786›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2020

Patterns of care for older patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer in the immunotherapy era.

Kenneth L Kehl, Michael J Hassett, Deborah Schrag

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Lung Cancer Stigma Then and Now: Continued Challenges Amid a Landscape of Progress.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kenneth L KehlDivision of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5339-9797
Michael J HassettDivision of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0754-3510
Deborah SchragDivision of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4334-5717
Harvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHistorically, older patients with advanced lung cancer have often received no systemic treatment. Immunotherapy has improved outcomes in clinical trials, but its dissemination and implementation at the population level is not well-understood.

methodsA retrospective cohort study of patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) diagnosed age 66 or older from 2012 to 2015 was conducted using SEER-Medicare. Treatment patterns within one year of diagnosis were ascertained. Outcomes included delivery of (a) any systemic therapy; (b) any second-line infusional therapy, following first-line infusional therapy; and (c) any second-line immunotherapy, following first-line infusional therapy. Trends in care patterns associated with second-line immunotherapy approvals in 2015 were assessed using generalized additive models. Sociodemographic and clinical predictors of treatment were explored using logistic regression.

resultsAmong 10 303 patients, 5173 (50.2%) received first-line systemic therapy, with little change between the years 2012 (47.5%) and 2015 (50.3%). Among 3943 patients completing first-line infusional therapy, the proportion starting second-line infusional treatment remained stable from 2012 (30.5%) through 2014 (32.9%), before increasing in 2015 (42.4%) concurrent with second-line immunotherapy approvals. Factors associated with decreased utilization of any therapy included age, black race, Medicaid eligibility, residence in a high-poverty area, nonadenocarcinoma histology, and comorbidity; factors associated with increased utilization of any therapy included Asian race and Hispanic ethnicity. Among patients who received first-line infusional therapy, factors associated with decreased utilization of second-line infusional therapy included age, Medicaid eligibility, nonadenocarcinoma histology, and comorbidity; Asian race was associated with increased utilization of second-line infusional therapy.

conclusionUnited States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of immunotherapy for the second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC in 2015 were associated with increased rates of any second-line treatment, but disparities based on social determinants of health persisted.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDrug ApprovalFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousLungLung NeoplasmsMaleMedicareNeoplasm StagingPractice Patterns, Physicians'Retrospective StudiesAntineoplastic Agents, Immunologicalgeriatricshealth services researchimmunotherapylung cancerpatterns of careSEER-Medicare

Identifiers

PMID31989786
PMCPMC7064091
OpenAlexW3003380701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.