Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31989696›Full record

ReviewConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2021

The uses and implications of avian vocalizations for conservation planning.

Rebecca N Lewis, Leah J Williams, R Tucker Gilman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Distress vocalizations ofCurrent zoology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rebecca N LewisDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-0595-6779
Leah J WilliamsNorth of England Zoological Society (Chester Zoo), Chester, CH2 1LH, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-8004-2187
R Tucker GilmanDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-2000-7966

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing recognition that animal behavior can affect wildlife conservation, but there have been few direct studies of animal behavior in conservation programs. However, a great deal of existing behavioral research can be applied in the context of conservation. Research on avian vocalizations provides an excellent example. The conspicuous nature of the vocal behavior of birds makes it a useful tool for monitoring populations and measuring biodiversity, but the importance of vocalizations in conservation goes beyond monitoring. Geographic song variants with population-specific signatures, or dialects, can affect territory formation and mate choice. Dialects are influenced by cultural evolution and natural selection and changes can accumulate even during the timescale of conservation interventions, such as translocations, reintroductions, and ex situ breeding. Information from existing research into avian vocalizations can be used to improve conservation planning and increase the success of interventions. Vocalizations can confer a number of benefits for conservation practitioners through monitoring, providing baseline data on populations and individuals. However, the influence of cultural variation on territory formation, mate choice, and gene flow should be taken into account because cultural differences could create obstacles for conservation programs that bring birds from multiple populations together and so reduce the success of interventions.

Indexed as

BirdsConservation of Natural ResourcesAnimalsAnimals, WildBehavior, AnimalBiodiversitybehaviorbioacousticsbioacústicabirdsongcanto de avescomportamientoconservation interventionscultural evolutionevolución culturalintervenciones de conservaciónmonitoreomonitoring保护干预措施文化演化生物声学监测行为鸟鸣

Identifiers

PMID31989696
PMCPMC7984439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.