ArticleClinical and experimental immunology2020
Comparison of elapegademase and pegademase in ADA-deficient patients and mice.
Article in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes following treatment for ADA-deficient severe combined immunodeficiency: a report from the PIDTC.Blood · 2022Trial
- In Vivo Comparison of Branched vs Linear Pegylation of a Capsule-Degrading Enzyme for Treatment of Anthrax.ACS omega · 2025Article
- PEGylated Recombinant Adenosine Deaminase Maintains Detoxification and Lymphocyte Counts in Patients with ADA-SCID.Journal of clinical immunology · 2023Article
- Safety and efficacy of elapegademase in patients with adenosine deaminase deficiency: A multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase 3, and postmarketing clinical study.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2023Review
- Trends and Perspectives of Biological Drug Approvals by the FDA: A Review from 2015 to 2021.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Research Progress of Conjugated Nanomedicine for Cancer Treatment.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Physically stimulus-responsive nanoparticles for therapy and diagnosis.Frontiers in chemistry · 2022Review
- A review of existing strategies for designing long-acting parenteral formulations: Focus on underlying mechanisms, and future perspectives.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2021Review
- An appraisal of the Wilson & Jungner criteria in the context of genomic-based newborn screening for inborn errors of immunity.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2021Review
- The Use of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells to Study the Effects of Adenosine Deaminase Deficiency on Human Neutrophil Development.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The absence of adenosine deaminase (ADA) causes severe combined immune deficiency (SCID), which has been treated with PEGylated bovine-extracted ADA (ADAGEN). ADAGEN was recently replaced by a PEGylated recombinant bovine ADA, expressed in Escherichia coli (elapegademase, ELA-ADA). Limited information on ELA-ADA is available. ADA enzymatic activity of ELA-ADA and ADAGEN was assessed in vitro at diverse dilutions. ADA activity and immune reconstitution in an ADA-SCID patient treated with ELA-ADA were compared with age-matched patients previously treated with ADAGEN. ADA activity and thymus reconstitution were evaluated in ADA-deficient mice following ELA-ADA or ADAGEN administered from 7 days postpartum. In vitro, ADA activity of ELA-ADA and ADAGEN were similar at all dilutions. In an ADA-SCID patient, ELA-ADA treatment led to a marked increase in trough plasma ADA activity, which was 20% higher than in a patient previously treated with ADAGEN. A marked increase in T cell numbers and generation of naive T cells was evident following 3 months of ELA-ADA treatment, while T cell numbers increased following 4 months in 3 patients previously treated with ADAGEN. T cell proliferations stimulation normalized and thymus shadow became evident following ELA-ADA treatment. ADA activity was significantly increased in the blood of ADA-deficient mice following ELA-ADA compared to ADAGEN, while both treatments improved the mice weights, the weight, number of cells in their thymus and thymocyte subpopulations. ELA-ADA has similar in- vitro and possibly better in-vivo activity than ADAGEN. Future studies will determine whether ELA-ADA results in improved long-term immune reconstitution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.