Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31989491›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical ecology2020

Fruit Volatiles of Creeping Cucumber (Solena amplexicaulis) Attract a Generalist Insect Herbivore.

Amarnath Karmakar, Paroma Mitra, Anamika Koner, Swati Das, Anandamay Barik

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical ecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amarnath KarmakarEcology Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, The University of Burdwan, West Bengal, Burdwan, 713 104, India.
Paroma MitraEcology Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, The University of Burdwan, West Bengal, Burdwan, 713 104, India.
Anamika KonerEcology Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, The University of Burdwan, West Bengal, Burdwan, 713 104, India.
Swati DasEcology Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, The University of Burdwan, West Bengal, Burdwan, 713 104, India.
Anandamay BarikEcology Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, The University of Burdwan, West Bengal, Burdwan, 713 104, India. anandamaybarik@yahoo.co.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6164-5000
University of Burdwan · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Herbivorous insects employ host plant volatile blends as cue for host recognition. Adults of Aulacophora foveicollis Lucas (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) feed on leaves, flowers, and fruits of Solena amplexicaulis (Lam.) Gandhi (syn: Melothria heterophylla) (Cucurbitaceae), commonly known as creeping cucumber. Currently, this pest is controlled by insecticides application. Hence, it is necessary to find out volatile components from fruits attracting the insect, which might be used for eco-friendly pest management program. behavioral responses of females were measured by Y-tube olfactometer bioassays towards volatile blends from undamaged (UD), insect-damaged (ID), and mechanically damaged (MD) fruits with the aim to identify the compounds responsible for host fruit location. Volatile organic compounds were identified and quantified by GC-MS and GC-FID analyses, respectively. Nonanal was predominant in volatile blends of UD, ID, and MD fruits. 1-Octen-3-ol, 3-octanone, 2-octanol, heptadienal (2E,4E), 1-pentadecanol, and 1-hexadecanol were present in volatile blends of ID and MD fruits, but females did not show response to these six compounds. 1-Octanol and 1-heptadecanol were unique in volatile blends of UD fruits after 4 hr of damage, but females did not show response to these compounds. Females were more attracted to volatile blends from UD fruits after 4 hr of damage in comparison to volatile blends released by UD fruits, due to increased emissions of (E,Z)-2,6-nonadienal and 2E-nonenal. A synthetic blend of 3.35 μg (E,Z)-2,6-nonadienal and 1.72 μg 2E-nonenal dissolved in 25 μl CH

Indexed as

HerbivoryAnimalsChemotaxisColeopteraCucurbitaceaeFemaleFood ChainFruitMaleVolatile Organic CompoundsVolatile Organic Compounds2E-nonenalAulacophora foveicollisChrysomelidaeColeoptera(E,Z)-2,6-nonadienalFruitsOlfactometer bioassaySolena amplexicaulisVolatiles

Identifiers

PMID31989491
OpenAlexW3004278490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.