SynthesisAdvances in therapy2020
Sulodexide for the Symptoms and Signs of Chronic Venous Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Advances in therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of Micronized Purified Flavonoid Fraction on Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Venous Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clinical drug investigation · 2026Pooled it
- The 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery, American Venous Forum, and American Vein and Lymphatic Society clinical practice guidelines for the management of varicose veins of the lower extremities. Part II: Endorsed by the Society of Interventional Radiology and the Society for Vascular Medicine.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2024Guideline
- Sulodexide for Diabetic-Induced Disabilities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Advances in therapy · 2021Pooled it
- Expert Consensus on the Clinical Application of Sulodexide in Vascular Diseases.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
- Sulodexide protects against sepsis-induced liver injury in neonatal rat by attenuating oxidative stress, apoptosis, and NF-κB/MAPK signaling.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Glycocalyx disruption, endothelial dysfunction and vascular remodeling as underlying mechanisms and treatment targets of chronic venous disease.International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology · 2024Review
- Changes of the serum properties and its effect on the endothelial cells restoration in patients with chronic venous disease treated with sulodexide.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2024Article
- Effects of a Dietary Supplement Composed of Baicalin, Bromelain and Escin for Venous Chronic Insufficiency Treatment: Insights from a Retrospective Observational Study.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Current challenges in the prevention and management of post-thrombotic syndrome-towards improved prevention.International journal of hematology · 2023Review
- Concentrations of selected acute phase proteins in patients with chronic venous insufficiency treated with Sulodexide. Part 1.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2023Article
- Brazilian guidelines on chronic venous disease of the Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery.Jornal vascular brasileiro · 2023Article
- Correlation of TNF-α, Cys C, and NLRP3 inflammasomes with venous ulcers in patients with lower extremity varicose veins.American journal of translational research · 2023Article
- Endothelial cells, neutrophils and platelets: getting to the bottom of an inflammatory triangle.Open biology · 2020Review
- Can Endothelial Glycocalyx Be a Major Morphological Substrate in Pre-Eclampsia?International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChronic venous disease (CVD) is a common condition associated with valvular dysfunction, venous hypertension and endothelial inflammation. Sulodexide facilitates the healing of venous ulcers and is frequently used in patients with CVD without ulcer. This review assessed the efficacy and safety of sulodexide for treatment of signs and symptoms of lower extremity CVD.
methodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and AMED as well as the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the World Health Organisation (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform Search Portal. We also manually searched potentially relevant journals, conference proceedings and journal supplements. Any study monitoring any effect of sulodexide in patients with CVD at any stage of the disease, classified or non-classified, was considered. Treatment effects were estimated using standardised mean differences (SMDs), mean differences (MDs) and risk ratios (RRs), as appropriate. We calculated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and heterogeneity (Q, tau and I
resultsThe search found 64 studies, but only 23 provided data on 7153 participants (mean age 55 years; 68% female). The 13 studies providing extractable quantitative information included 1901 participants (mean age 55.2 years; 65% female). Sulodexide decreased the intensity of pain, cramps, heaviness, oedema and total symptom score and reduced inflammatory mediators in patients with CVD. The risk of adverse events (AEs) was not different between sulodexide and placebo or heparan sulphate (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.74-2.32; I
conclusionSulodexide was found to have a beneficial venoactive effect on the major signs and symptoms of CVD such as pain, cramps, heaviness and oedema without increasing the risk of AEs. It is also likely to exert a systemic effect on the course of CVD by interfering with inflammatory chemokines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.