Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31989485›Full record

SynthesisAdvances in therapy2020

Repetitive Magnetic Stimulation for the Management of Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review.

Abdullah Aamir, Ayesha Girach, Ptolemaios Georgios Sarrigiannis, Marios Hadjivassiliou, Antonela Paladini, Giustino Varrassi, Panagiotis Zis

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. [The research progress on the improvement effect of repeated peripheral magnetic stimulation on upper limb and lower limb spasm after stroke].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Abdullah AamirUniversity Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
Ayesha GirachMedical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Ptolemaios Georgios SarrigiannisAcademic Directorate of Neurosciences, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Marios HadjivassiliouAcademic Directorate of Neurosciences, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Antonela PaladiniUniversity of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Giustino VarrassiPaolo Procacci Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Panagiotis ZisMedical School, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus. takiszis@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8567-3092
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBFondazione Roma · ITUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Cyprus · CYUniversity of L'Aquila · ITUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRepetitive magnetic stimulation (rMS) is a safe and well-tolerated intervention. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is used for the treatment of depression and for the treatment and prevention of migraine. Over the last few years, several reports and randomised controlled studies of the use of rMS for the treatment of pain have been published. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the available literature regarding the use of rMS in the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain.

methodsAfter a systematic Medline search we identified 12 papers eligible to be included in this review.

resultsThe majority of the studies were on patients with phantom limb pain, followed by radiculopathy, plexopathy, post-traumatic pain and peripheral neuropathy. The treatment protocols vary significantly from study to study and, therefore, pooling the results together is currently difficult. However, rMS has a definite immediate effect in pain relief which, in the majority of studies, is maintained for a few weeks.

conclusionrMS seems to be a promising intervention in the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain. Further research is in the field is needed. Use of neuronavigation might increase the precision of stimulation and subsequently its effectiveness.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansMagnetic Field TherapyMaleNeuralgiaPain ManagementNeuropathic painPeripheralRepetitive magnetic stimulationTMS

Identifiers

PMID31989485
OpenAlexW3001533927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.